User talk:MisterData124

January 2022

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Economy of China. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use your sandbox. Your change contradicted the cited reference. David Biddulph (talk) 12:07, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi MisterData124! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia – it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. David Biddulph (talk) 12:07, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Economy of Poland. David Biddulph (talk) 12:08, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism

I suck please suck my cook

February 2022

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Jauerback^dude?/_dude. 14:52, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]