User talk:Mjhammerle123
Welcome
[edit]
|
September 2008
[edit]
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Wikipedia. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. JNW (talk) 05:51, 21 September 2008 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of NFL standings
[edit]
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article NFL standings, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Fram (talk) 08:01, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
Texas Rangers
[edit]Change the schedule back to ALL LINKS; it just looks better than black and blue bolds and non-bolds ---confusing--- Ositadinma (talk) 23:30, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
Your recent edits
[edit]Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button 
located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 03:59, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
NFC North Standings
[edit]Please be advised that the win/loss streaks are only for this season, which began on September 10, 2009. All previous seasons are excluded. TomCat4680 (talk) 03:05, 19 September 2009 (UTC)
TomCat4680 (talk) has given you a kitten! Kittens promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Kittens must be fed three times a day and will be your faithful companion forever! Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a kitten, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.
Spread the goodness of kittens by adding {{subst:Kitten}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message!
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you.
NHL Championships
[edit]You might want to read the note that is attached the Most Championships field before engaging in an edit war. I will quote it here. "The Montreal Canadiens won 23 Stanley Cups as part of the NHL. However the Stanley Cup has not always been solely the NHL championship trophy. The Canadiens were also the league champions in 1918–19 when the Spanish flu cancelled the Stanley Cup finals and in 1924–25 when they lost the Stanley Cup finals to the Victoria Cougars, who were part of the WCHL." -DJSasso (talk) 17:11, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
Calendar entries
[edit]Hello. When adding births or deaths to the calendar articles like July 8, please add what the person is known for also. This should be short and sweet, and as you will see, all of the entries have this minimum bit of information. Thanks. -- Mufka (u) (t) (c) 20:40, 8 July 2010 (UTC)
The article Skate or Die (Law & Order) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- No evidence this single television episode is individually notable.
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — Gavia immer (talk) 03:38, 19 September 2010 (UTC)
The article Athletics at the 1968 Summer Olympics – Men's 1500 metres has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- No editorial content, purely a collection of sports statistics.
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Crispmuncher (talk) 13:09, 29 September 2011 (UTC)
Talkback
[edit]
Message added 06:55, 13 October 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
—Bagumba (talk) 06:55, 13 October 2011 (UTC)
Colts elimination
[edit]reply hmm... if you say so. I'd still like to see a way for 6-10 to be the wild card given that Bills play the Jets and Titans (all 5 wins), chargers (4 wins) play the Bills and Broncos (both 5 wins), Raiders (6 wins) have the chiefs and chargers (both 4 wins), and Jets play the chiefs (5 wins, 4 wins) - but there probably is one somewhere. 188.221.79.22 (talk) 16:41, 21 November 2011 (UTC)
Packers' division-clinching scenario for Week 13
[edit]Common opponents is the third tiebreaker, while conference record is the fourth tiebreaker. The uncommon opponents between the Packers and Bears are their NFC West and NFC East opponents (vs. the Rams and at the Giants for GB, and at the Eagles and vs. the Seahawks for CHI). If the Bears were to run the table, that means that they would have to beat Seattle in Week 15, therefore winning both of their uncommon games (they beat the Eagles in Week 9). The Packers already beat the Rams in Week 6, and if they beat the Giants, they too will have also beaten both of their uncommon opponents, therefore canceling out the common opponents' tiebreaker and moving on to the next applicable tiebreaker: conference record.
As of the end of Week 12, the Packers' conference record is 9–0, while the Bears, whose conference record is currently 6–3, can finish no better than 9–3. A Packers' win over the Giants (in Week 13) gives Green Bay no worse than a 10–2 conference record. Therefore, the Chiefs/Bears game in Week 13 has no effect on the Packers' division-clinching scenario, however, the Packers DO need a Lions' loss (at New Orleans) to lock up the division (due to common opponents' record). DPH1110 (talk) 22:26, 28 November 2011 (UTC)DPH1110
Re: Nationwide standings
[edit]The reason why it was undone was to avoid an edit conflict. By the time I had started collating the results, the page had been changed by yourself, and thus would have caused the conflict if the edit had been carried out. The best way to avoid such a situation would be to carry out the results in full; rather than arranging the drivers by positions first, before entering the latest race results in. Saves some bandwidth too, and causes less controversy! Regards. Craig(talk) 16:59, 11 March 2012 (UTC)
- Apologies if any offence was caused; that just wasn't my intention. I just forget sometimes how other people may react to edit summaries...if they see a generic "rv: part-edit.", it doesn't specify what the problem is or any remedy for improvement. I'll definitely remember next time! Regards. Craig(talk) 20:07, 11 March 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 9
[edit]Hi. When you recently edited 2012 Texas Rangers season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Matt Thornton (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:20, 9 April 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for February 25
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2013 NASCAR Sprint Cup Series, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Michael McDowell (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:29, 25 February 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for March 8
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2012–13 Exeter City F.C. season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Scott Bennett (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:05, 8 March 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 17
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2013 NASCAR Camping World Truck Series, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chris Jones (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 01:50, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for February 3
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2013 NFL season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Fox (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:02, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
March 2014
[edit]
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to 2014 NASCAR Nationwide Series may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- |}
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 18:48, 1 March 2014 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:37, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]
Hello, Mjhammerle123. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |