User talk:Mkreft
Your submission at Articles for creation[edit]
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Chartered Financial Consultant.
- To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk, via real time chat with helpers, or on the
- Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Excirial (Contact me,Contribs) 06:38, 11 June 2012 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation[edit]
- To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk, via real time chat with helpers, or on the
Wikipedia has several articles that make reference to a Chartered Financial Consultant (e.g. The American College, Financial Adviser, Financial Planner) but there is no article on the topic. It' a widely recognized designation in the financial services industry. If the article is declined again, please provide specific reasons why you believe it sounds like an "advertisement." This is in fact not an advertisement, and I'm having difficulty seeing where/how that notion is coming across.
Chartered Financial Consultant[edit]
Hello, I am sorry if I already posted this - I am brand new here. I'm writing an article on the Chartered Financial Consultant, a widely recognized designation in the financial services industry. I noticed several Wikipedia pages make reference to it ("Financial Adviser," "Financial Planner," "The American College"), but there is no Wikipedia article on the topic. My submission was rejected b/c it "sounds like an advertisement." I resubmitted it just now and have included a wider range of references. I hope this corrects the issue, as this is not an advertisement and I'm having difficulty seeing where/how this is being perceived as such. If it is still not acceptable, could you please be more specific as to how it sounds like an advertisement? Thanks.
Mike — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mkreft (talk • contribs) 19:19, 17 June 2012 (UTC)
- The version i originally declined pretty much read as an advertisement, with an altogether positive bias regarding the subject of the article. For example, take the following line:
The program is now the most extensive educational program required for any financial services credential and has become a highly coveted distinction among financial advisors wishing to provided comprehensive, advanced planning solutions for their clients
- Marked in bold are the most promotional parts of the line. The first two sections are Peacock Terms, which means that they add nothing to the line except a positive bias towards the subject. In its entirety, the line could more or less be translated to "If your a financial service professional, you should get this certiffication as it is the best there is. Without it, you can't deliver the best possible level of service to your customers". While this line definitely standards out in its Non-neutralness there are other instances in this version that suffer from the same issue. I see that the revised version is a lot better though.
- Another issue i see on the page, is that the added sourced won't classify as reliable for most part. As WP:42 states: Articles require significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject.". The added links are a combination of the organization governing the qualification, and institutions that offer the qualification itself (Most times writing glowing testimonies as to why people should follow it). As of such these links fail the "Independent" part of the reliable sources policy. In order to meet the RS criteria, other sources should be found to at least complement the current selection. Examples of reliable sources would be any mentions in sufficiently large newspapers (Substantiation mentions, not advertisements) such as the New York Times, any sufficiently large profession related literature or major websites.
- Finally, i would note that the page is not up for review at this time. To do this, click the "Here" link in the declined template (When the submission is ready to be re-submitted, click here and press the Save page button to request a new review) and save the page. This will add a new review request to the button om the page, submitting the page for review alongside it. Excirial (Contact me,Contribs) 18:18, 19 June 2012 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation[edit]
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Chartered Financial Consultant.
- To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk, via real time chat with helpers, or on the
Welcome to Wikipedia! Need a hand?[edit]
|
Hello! Mkreft,
I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! SarahStierch (talk) 03:44, 23 January 2013 (UTC)
|
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Chartered Financial Consultant, a page you created has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace. If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements. If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13. Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 20:53, 19 August 2013 (UTC)
Your article submission Chartered Financial Consultant[edit]
Hello Mkreft. It has been over six months since you last edited your article submission, entitled Chartered Financial Consultant.
The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Chartered Financial Consultant}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 15:01, 24 November 2013 (UTC)
Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion[edit]
This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident in which you may be involved. Thank you. Brianhe (talk) 19:56, 26 July 2015 (UTC)