User talk:Mmccalpin

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, Mmccalpin, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, please be sure to sign your name on Talk and vote pages using four tildes (~~~~) to produce your name and the current date, or three tildes (~~~) for just your name. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my Talk page. Again, welcome!

-Poli (talk • contribs) 02:53, 2005 July 29 (UTC)

Your draft[edit]

I have moved it to User:Mmccalpin/Draft of John Millard Stemmons. It's best to put drafts in user space as opposed to article space. If you have any more queries about this, just give me a buzz and I'll be glad to help you out. Cheers. enochlau (talk) 03:25, 16 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I just happened to be passing by Special:Newpages where I saw it. enochlau (talk) 12:12, 16 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Mmccalpin, in response to your message on my talk page, my reference to POV was in this section:

"Although a mainstream supermarket brand in Europe, Gevalia attempts to market itelf in the United States an ultra-premium brand despite its almost exclusive use of unsolicited bulk e-mail and Web page banner ads."

I don't know about you, but "attempts to market itself ... despite" strikes me as pretty POV. Good luck with improving the article; I have little knowledge of the subject myself, I was just on recent changes patrol and that section caught my attention. Happy editing, --YFB ¿ 19:44, 26 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

HMS Pomone[edit]

Thanks for pointing out the renaming of the Pomone article Viv Hamilton 08:25, 13 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Skylink[edit]

Thank you for taking the time to investigate the issue with Skylink topspeed. Despite much research I could not find any sources that agreed, nor any sources that could confirm a topspeed of the previously cited 50mph. I'm glad you were able to find out more information and solve the matter! Thanks again! -- RedPoptarts 08:54, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Date for the Wreck of HMS Pomone (1805) in the HMS Pomone (1811) article[edit]

Hi, the entry in Colledge gives the fate of the ship as "Wrecked 14.1.1811 The Needles". However, given the other sources you have found, I think it is a misprint for 14.10.1811. I have corrected the article, taking the liberty of citing one of your references. Many thanks for pointing out this error. -- Best wishes Jll 00:27, 10 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Date for gun install photo[edit]

You raise an excellent point! The caption comes from http://navweaps.com/Weapons/WNUS_12-45_mk5_pics.htm, which is the source of a lot of the information given for the article, and reads "USS Connecticut B-18 getting one of her bow 12"/45 (30.5 cm) guns installed on 31 January 1908 at the New York Navy Yard." As you point out, however, that would have been impossible, as the Connecticut would have been somewhere near Chile on that date. For my own sake, I have to point out that I looked back at my edit log and am glad to say that I didn't write in that error, it was added by someone else. Still, thanks for bringing it to my attention, and I've already changed it to read "c.1907." Thanks! Jrt989 (talk) 16:55, 22 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Refimprove[edit]

Thank you :) WhisperToMe (talk) 23:16, 22 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

These Pupusa look just like stuffed Parantha, just that these pupusa are made from corn, rather than wheat flour. Any thoughts???? EyeMD T|C 16:01, 27 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:07, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Mmccalpin. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The article Attendant console has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced for 10 years. Searching for the term only finds a few equipment manuals for this type of equipment, nothing that indicates it actually meets WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.