User talk:Mmgtdwstlfssls

Welcome to Wikipedia![edit]

Hello Mmgtdwstlfssls!

Welcome to Wikipedia, a free and open-content encyclopedia. I hope you enjoy contributing. To help get you settled in, I thought you might find the following pages useful:

Don't worry too much about being perfect. Everyone makes mistakes, but you can click here to see how you can avoid making some common ones.

If you are still stuck, you can type {{helpme}} here, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Or, you can join the newcomer's help room at: #wikipedia-en-help ^connect, where volunteers can answer your questions.

If you are unsure of how to do something, you are welcome to ask a more experienced user, such as an administrator. One last bit of advice: please sign any discussion comment with four tildes (~~~~). The software will automatically convert this into your signature. I hope I have not overwhelmed you with information. If you need any help just let me know. Once again, welcome to Wikipedia, and don't forget to be BOLD! —Legoktm (talk) 21:17, 31 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit at WP:RFA[edit]

Hi Mmgtdwstlfssls, I have reverted your edit to this page since it looked like you were trying to nominate yourself for bureaucratship. I encourage you to read this essay before applying for adminship. Legoktm (talk) 21:17, 31 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

May 2013[edit]

Please do not remove information from articles, as you did to Virgin Killer. Wikipedia is not censored, and content is not removed on the sole grounds of perceived offensiveness. Please discuss this issue on the article's talk page to reach consensus rather than continuing to remove the disputed material. If the content in question involves images, you also have the option to configure Wikipedia to hide the images that you may find offensive. Thank you. Theroadislong (talk) 15:20, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at EastEnders, you may be blocked from editing. Theroadislong (talk) 15:22, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at May Mahlangu, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Theroadislong (talk) 15:23, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar[edit]

I'm somewhat confused. I don't think our paths have crossed before, so I don't know what I have done to offend you. -- Daemonic Kangaroo (talk) 15:27, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You have been indefinitely blocked from editing for Vandalism. If you feel this block is unjustified, you may contest it by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Kubigula (talk) 15:27, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mmgtdwstlfssls (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

i am very sorry for vandelising Wikipedia I was very bored and promise I will never do it again. If I am to edit again I will do it for the good of wikipedia, not myself

Decline reason:

Even prior to today's vandalism spree, your editing history does not give me much confidence in your ability to contribute constructively. A sample of your edits shows carelessness (see here and here), and I also see a gross violation of the WP:BLP policy (see [1]). If you had an appreciable number of positive contributions, I would not be averse to a second chance; however, as it is, I do not see how this would be of benefit to the encyclopedia. --Kinu ^t/_c 23:35, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Would you mind telling us what topics/articles you would be interested in making what changes to? - Vianello (Talk) 17:41, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I would be interested in editing football articles especially ones revolving around Swedish clubs and I would also work on editing information on football stubs from around the world. I am very sorry and I promise you I would make good changes to Wikipedia and would be a helpful and useful member of the team.

A barnstar for you![edit]

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	Well Done Mate! IlRagazzo99 (talk) 13:24, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

April 2014[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mmgtdwstlfssls (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

i do not know why i have been blocked, my mum used my account to vandalise wikapedia, i am very sorry for my mums actions. please unblock my account, it is not here fault that she has anger issues and is disabled Mmgtdwstlfssls (talk) 09:40, 28 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Blaming your mother isn't something we haven't seen before, especially when this unblock request has an identical 'hand' (writing style) to the one immediately after the block. Sorry, but no. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 09:54, 28 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.