User talk:Mmmerlot
United States Capitol Police Chief Steven A. Sund
[edit]Steven A. Sund was sworn in as the 10th Capitol Police Chief in June 2019. He joined the USCP in 2017 after he was recruited to become the Assistant Chief of Police/Chief of Operations.
Prior to his coming to the USCP, Sund served with the Metropolitan Police Department in Washington, DC, for more than 25 years. He retired as the Commander of the Special Operations Division, within the Homeland Security Bureau. In this assignment, then-Commander Sund oversaw a number of specialized units to include the Emergency Response Team; Aviation and Harbor Units; Horse Mounted and Canine Units; Special Events/Dignitary Protection Branch; Major Crash and Commercial Motor Carrier Enforcement; Automated Traffic Enforcement, and the Domestic Security Operations Unit.
During his career, Sund also served as a lead planner for the 2009 and 2013 Presidential Inaugurations, and had a significant planning role in the major events designated as NSSEs by the Department of Homeland Security. Chief Sund is a recognized expert in critical incident management and active shooter preparedness and response. His experience involves being the on-scene incident commander on the 2009 shooting at the National Holocaust Museum, the 2012 shooting at the Family Research Council, and the 2013 active shooter incident at the Washington Navy Yard.
Due to his expertise, he has been an instructor with the United States Secret Service in the area of major events planning and has taught Incident Command System (ICS) at the George Washington University as an adjunct professor.
Chief Sund received his Bachelor of Science and Master of Science degrees from Johns Hopkins University, and a Master of Arts in Homeland Security from the Naval Postgraduate School. Mmmerlot (talk) 01:17, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
Welcome!
[edit]Hello, Mmmerlot, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Steven Sund did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.
If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to The Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Introduction tutorial
- Contributing to Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Simplified Manual of Style
- Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need personal help ask me on my talk page, or . Again, welcome. – Arms & Hearts (talk) 15:58, 28 January 2021 (UTC)
February 2021
[edit] Hello, I'm 蟲蟲飛. I noticed that you recently removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. May♡♡→♡℃※Talk 06:14, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
March 2021
[edit] Hi Mmmerlot! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at Timeline of the 2021 storming of the United States Capitol that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia – it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 22:55, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Got it, thank you! Didn’t know. Mmmerlot (talk) 21:21, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
- No worries, you will learn as you go. Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 15:21, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:57, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Your unexplained deletion of a well-referenced text was reverted. Please always explain significant changes in edit summaries. - Altenmann >talk 17:58, 6 August 2024 (UTC)
Your editing
[edit]You started editing in articles on subjects where it appears you have no expertise (Alexei Ratmansky, Boris and Gleb, Harbin). Therefore if you see something you think suspicious, please discuss you worries in talk pages, especially when editing text supplied with references, as you did in Harbin. - Altenmann >talk 18:13, 6 August 2024 (UTC)
- How do you know I have no expertise? Additionally, this is Wikipedia, not Britannica. Mmmerlot (talk) 20:50, 6 August 2024 (UTC)
- From your incorrect edits. Yes, it is not Britannica, and precisely for this reason our editing must be based on published reliable sources. So in the future please justify your addition of deletion of information by citing sources. - Altenmann >talk 21:03, 6 August 2024 (UTC)
August 2024
[edit] Please do not add or change content, as you did at Steven Sund, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.. - Altenmann >talk 21:12, 6 August 2024 (UTC)