User talk:Mohammad Shah

March 2009

Your edits to Pakhtunkhwa have been removed as a copyright violation. See Wikipedia:Non-free content. -- SEWilco (talk) 23:38, 28 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Pakhtunkhwa. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 23:45, 28 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

June 2009

Please refrain from making unhelpful edits to North-West Frontier Province, like this edit. Your edit has been reverted by 3 different editors, yet you seem unable to grasp the point that this is not a political issue. Midnight Madness (talk) 22:25, 2 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to Wikipedia. However, please know that editors do not own articles and should respect the work of their fellow contributors on North-West Frontier Province. If you create or edit an article, know that others are free to change its content. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Pahari Sahib 13:20, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to North-West Frontier Province. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Pahari Sahib 13:34, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits to North-West Frontier Province

Please explain this edit, you say "Pashto is an accent of Pakhto, it is neither "the" language or another language. Only correct what you know please and not for the sake of it"

First of all Wikipedia has an article on Pashto language, Pakhto language is a redirect to it. Secondly you changed Pashtun to Pakhtun, Wikipedia tends to use the former spelling, there is an article called Pashtun people, both Pakhtun people and Pakhtun redirect to it. Also you changed Peshawar to Pekhawar, I have now created the later as a redirect to the former - this is the standard spelling employed by the government of Pakistan, by the international media and by Wikipedia.

Also you have again added the uncited line "although there are moves to formalise Pakhtunkhwa", please discuss this on the talk page. Pahari Sahib 14:27, 7 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

3rd opinion for NWFP

Following your latest edit I have now asked for a 3rd opinion on the subject. You are welcome to comment at here. Secondly please don't accuse other editors of being ignorant, you keep introducing links that do not exist such as Pashto/Pakhto instead of linking to existing articles (e.g. Pashto language). Thirdly you keep adding "although there are moves to formalise Pakhtunkhwa" to the lead section but do not back it up.

Finally the article on Pakhtunkhwa says it means "The Land of the Pashtoons" which runs counter to your argument. The last point is fairly minor but the others need to be addressed. Pahari Sahib 20:54, 8 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

June 2009

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. carl bunderson (talk) (contributions) 20:57, 13 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. carl bunderson (talk) (contributions) 21:00, 13 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. carl bunderson (talk) (contributions) 21:09, 13 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The standard English spelling is Pashto. Do not change it again. Pakhto is a far less common spelling in English. carl bunderson (talk) (contributions) 21:15, 13 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You have been temporarily blocked from editing Wikipedia as a result of your disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our policies concerning neutral point of view and biographies of living persons will not be tolerated. Kingturtle (talk) 21:23, 13 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I just removed material that you had added to the /* Ethnic groups */ section of the Afghanistan article as it was a copyright violation. That material was directly taken from About.com. See Talk:Afghanistan#Ethnic groups. Before you resume editing, please read and process the Wikipedia's policy on copyright at Wikipedia:Copyright violations and Wikipedia:Copyrights and take a look at Wikipedia's copyright FAQ. I especially call your attention to the sentence, "Never use materials that infringe the copyrights of others." --Bejnar (talk) 22:58, 15 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Afghanistan

Hello. It seems that you are violating copy right rules. Besides that, your edit does not seem to be an improvement. People who are interested in Pashtuns can easily find information in the Pashtun people article. A more detailed description is also given in Demographics of Afghanistan.

Since you also seem to be new in Wikipedia, please take some time to read this page.

Thank you. Tajik (talk) 21:47, 16 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]