User talk:Mohit7feb

Your submission at Articles for creation: Shri Ram Murti Smarak College of Engineering and Technology (August 5)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Shri Ram Murti Smarak College of Engineering and Technology and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Shri Ram Murti Smarak College of Engineering and Technology, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 07:39, 5 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Mohit7feb! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 07:39, 5 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Shri Ram Murti Smarak Trust[edit]

I have moved your draft to Draft:Shri Ram Murti Smarak Trust and added a messagebox with a "Submit your draft for review" button. In its current state it will not be accepted, though. Huon (talk) 16:29, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

March 2019[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or promotion. From your contributions, this seems to be your only purpose.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Huon (talk) 16:43, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Also undeclared paid editing in violation of the Terms of Use. If necessary, I can privately provide the evidence to an admin reviewing this block. Huon (talk) 16:45, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mohit7feb (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I did create page about Shri Ram Murti Smarak Trust as I know it in and out and they are doing great charity services in the society for downtrodden and I wish it must be known to the masses through Wiki search so that needy & poor people can get benefitted. However, if it looked like favoured promotion, I would refrain myself from such activities. I would only edit Articles written by else, till the time I gain reputation of genuineness on WIKIPEDIA Mohit7feb (talk) 12:43, 19 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

"I wish it must be known to the masses through Wiki search so that needy & poor people can get benefitted" No. If this is your goal, it's a clear and outright violation of WP:PROMO. Additionally, the content you added was completely inappropriate. "the college has demonstrated perennial evidence of merit and quality", "It is developing by leaps and bounds", "internationally recognised standards of excellence", "The campus is aesthetically planned and designed with exquisite facilities". Sorry, this is some of the worst content I've ever seen on Wikipedia, breathtakingly inappropriate. You don't sufficiently address this in your unblock request, so I'm worried you don't see how completely unsuited that sort of writing is for Wikipedia. As such, I have to decline your unblock to protect this encyclopedia. Yamla (talk) 13:09, 19 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Draft:Shri Ram Murti Smarak Trust concern[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Shri Ram Murti Smarak Trust, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 00:05, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Shri Ram Murti Smarak Trust[edit]

Hello, Mohit7feb. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Shri Ram Murti Smarak Trust".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 03:01, 23 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mohit7feb (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I apologise that my activities doesn't comply the guidelines as I was very new here. Though my intension was not to advertise anyone. I am accepting my fault and can assure that I would always follow guidelines. I want to contribute by adding and editing to places that I know for making Wikipedia a better resoursable platform. Please lift my block and You can closely monitor my activities.

Decline reason:

This unblock request has been declined due to your history of vandalism and/or disruption to this encyclopedia. However, we are willing to give you another chance provided that you can earn back the trust of the Wikipedia community. To be unblocked you need to demonstrate and confirm that you are willing and able to contribute positively to Wikipedia. You can do this by:

Familiarizing yourself with our basic rules.
Reading our guide to improving articles.
Picking any pre-existing article you wish to improve.
- If you have trouble choosing an article to improve, see this index of articles needing improvement for ideas.

Once you have decided on the article you will propose improvements to:

1. Click the Edit tab at the top of that article;
2. Copy the portion of the prose from that article that you will be proposing changes to. However:
  - do not copy the "infobox" from the start of the article (i.e., markup like this: {{infobox name|...}}),
  - do not copy any image placement code (i.e., markup like this: [[File:Name.jpg|thumb|caption]]),
  - do not copy the page's categories from the bottom of the page (i.e., markup like this: [[Category:Name]]),
  - and do not copy the stub tag (if there) from the bottom of the page (i.e., markup like this: {{Foo stub}});
3. Click edit at your talk page and paste at the bottom under a new section header (like this: == [[Article title]] ==) the copied content but do not save yet;
4. Place your cursor in the edit summary box and paste there an edit summary in the following form which specifies the name of the article you copied from and links to it (this is required for mandatory copyright attribution): "Copied content from [[exact Name of Article]]; see that article's history for attribution."
5. You can now save the page. However, if your edits will include any citations to reliable sources (which they should), add the following template to the end of your prose: {{reflist-talk}}. Once you have added the template, click Publish changes.
Now, edit that content. Propose significant and well researched improvements by editing the selected portion of the article. Please note that we are not looking for basic typo corrections, or small unreferenced additions; your edits should be substantial, and reflect relevant policies.
When you are done with your work, re-request unblocking using {{unblock}} and an administrator will review your proposed edits.
- If we (including the original blocking admin) are convinced that your proposed edits will hopefully improve Wikipedia as an encyclopedia, you will be unblocked.

If you need help while working with your proposed edits, you may add "{{Help me|your question here ~~~~}}" to your talk page. Thank you. 331dot (talk) 10:09, 8 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.