User talk:Mojtaba Cazi

Welcome

WARNING: This user is editing wikipedia purely to spam his URL. If I knew how to undo all of his edits, I would. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.138.151.69 (talk) 19:47, 15 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your recent contributions seem to be advertising or for promotional purposes. Wikipedia does not allow advertising in articles. For more information on this, see

If you still have questions, there is a new contributor's help page, or you can write {{helpme}} below this message along with a question and someone will be along to answer it shortly. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia.

I hope you enjoy editing Wikipedia! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! -- Atama ^chat 15:56, 15 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

September 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to IPhone OS version history, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: IPhone OS version history was changed by Mojtaba Cazi (u) (t) deleting 18039 characters on 2008-09-15T19:11:38+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 19:11, 15 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The recent edit you made to IPhone OS version history constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to remove content. Thank you. – iride scent 19:44, 15 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing, such as the edit you made to IPhone OS version history. If your vandalism continues, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. -- Atama ^chat 20:52, 15 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

cazisoft.blogspot.com: Linksearch en (insource) - meta - de - fr - simple - wikt:en - wikt:fr • Spamcheck • MER-C X-wiki • gs • Reports: Links on en - COIBot - COIBot-Local • Discussions: tracked - advanced - RSN • COIBot-Link, Local, & XWiki Reports - Wikipedia: en - fr - de • Google: search • meta • Domain: domaintools • AboutUs.com

Using IPs is not helping your cause:

83.138.151.69 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · blacklist hits · AbuseLog · what links to user page · count · COIBot · Spamcheck · user page logs · x-wiki · status · Edit filter search · Google · StopForumSpam)

W

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing Wikipedia for continuing to add spam links. If you wish to make useful contributions, you may place {{unblock}} on your user talk page to have the block reviewed. Persistent spammers will have their websites blacklisted from Wikipedia. --Dirk Beetstra ^{T C} 14:49, 16 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Further explanation of block:

Your main target throughout your edits is to add a blogspot. First in external links (unsuitable per the external links guideline), later hard pushing as a 'reference'. You do not discuss (except for a 'warning' to an IP who reverted .. diff .. well, hardly a warning ..), you just revert and keep doing that. Blogspots are generally not suitable as a reference, they generally fail our reliable sources guideline (no editorial oversight). Moreover, it seems you have a conflict of interest, which strongly discourages additions of such links yourself. I hopet this explains. --Dirk Beetstra ^{T C} 16:07, 16 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mojtaba Cazi (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I think adding a reference will be helpfull, however now and after reviewing the policy I will contribute (as before) according the wikipedia policy; so please remove me from your bloked list

Decline reason:

Yes, adding references can be useful, but the block addresses the type of references you continuously add. Please read the reliable sources guideline, and the conflict of interest guideline (and maybe some other policies and guidelines as well. If you think that you can contribute following those, then please request another unblock (using {{unblock}}; and please post that at the bottom of this page. Thanks. --Dirk Beetstra ^{T C} 13:27, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mojtaba Cazi (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

according to your Request I read the reliable sources guideline carefully so I can promise to contribute with wikipedia policy's

Decline reason:

Since you haven't made any contributions except spamming I'm declining this. I'd like to see some evidence of what you will contribute first. — Spartaz ^Humbug! 05:58, 26 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

More specifically, if you are unblocked, you understand that adding any more links to your blog will result in an immediate reblock? It's not uncommon for users to say "I read the policies, and I still think my link is appropriate." If you agree to not attempt to add that link or similar links, your unblock will be considered. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 01:32, 26 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

According to your request i will not add link to my blog any more in wikipedia.Mojtaba Cazi (talk) 05:59, 26 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please also explain what areas you intent to positively contribute to the project? Spartaz ^Humbug! 06:47, 26 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s):

As blocking admin I am going to grant this unblock, assuming good faith on your behalf. Please, for next edits, do not include your blog without previous discussion (with response and consensus) with other users (e.g. with an appropriate wikiproject, see Wikipedia:WikiProject, or with regulars on pages you are interested in), and when your edits get reverted, do not re-revert, but discuss your edits with that editor first. Happy editing.

Request handled by: Dirk Beetstra ^{T C} 09:36, 26 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

--Dirk Beetstra ^{T C} 09:36, 26 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for unblocking my account! Mojtaba Cazi (talk) 10:06, 26 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]