User talk:Mokumbear
Dalbury: Thank you for helping me to understand Wikipedia's rules, and I intend to incorporate them in future edits, but also bear in mind that you are violating the following Wikipedia suggestion:
"Avoidance The best way to resolve a dispute is to avoid it in the first place."
Be respectful to others and their points of view. This means primarily: Do not simply revert changes in a dispute. When someone makes an edit you consider biased or inaccurate, improve the edit, rather than reverting it. Provide a good edit summary when making significant changes that other users might object to. The revision you would prefer will not be established by reverting, and repeated reverting is forbidden; discuss disputed changes on the talk page. If you encounter rude or inappropriate behavior, resist the temptation to respond unkindly, and do not make personal attacks."
Thank you...
Mokumbear 01:42, 15 February 2007 (UTC)Mokumbear
Mokumbear, please read Wikipedia's core policies, Wikipedia:Verifiability, Wikipedia:Neutral point of view, Wikipedia:No original research and Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not, particularly the section Wikipedia is not a soapbox. Your edits to Morikami Park and Morikami Museum and Japanese Gardens violate all of those policies, and cannot remain in the articles. I have reverted your latest edit to Morikami Museum and Japanese Gardens. Please do not try to add it again. -- Donald Albury 03:44, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
Please do not add content without citing reliable sources. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. -- Donald Albury 14:06, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
Please stop. Continuing to add unsourced or original content, as you did to Morikami Park, is considered vandalism and may result in a block. -- Donald Albury 15:54, 17 February 2007 (UTC)