Jump to content

User talk:Momomenofy

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Orphaned non-free image File:Petrojet.bmp

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Petrojet.bmp. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

  • I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
  • I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
  • If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
  • To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
  • If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.


Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:34, 16 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello. Concerning your upload of the image File:Waleed soliman.jpg, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted images obtained from other sources, without the permission of the author(s). This image appears to be a direct copy from Various internet sites. As a copyright violation, File:Waleed soliman.jpg falls under the speedy deletion criteria and has been deleted.

If you believe that the image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under a free license then you should do one of the following:
  • If you have permission from the author, leave me a message explaining the details and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
  • If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the <pick a free licence> or released into the public domain leave me a message at my talk page with a link to where I can find that note.
  • If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on [[Talk:File:Waleed soliman.jpg]].
  • Or alternately drop me a note about this file if I have misunderstood something.
    - Peripitus (Talk) 12:02, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Suez.JPG

[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Suez.JPG. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Peripitus (Talk) 12:03, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Waleed soliman.jpg

[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Waleed soliman.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --Peripitus (Talk) 10:46, 7 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

السلام عليكم يا اخي. الشغل اللي انت عملته في مقالة وليد سليمان عجبني جدا. هو كان نقصه بس الاستشهاد بمصادر. لان من غير مصادر المقالة ممكن تبقى معرضة للحذف بحسب قوانين وكيبديا الصارمة. انا حاولت اضيف بعض المصادر بس كنت عاوز الفت نظر حضرتك انك ما تحذفش المعلومات اللي بتبقى موجوده مع المصدر (زي اسم الكاتب و تاريخ الكتابة و تاريخ الوصول للمصدر) لان المعلومات ديه مهمة جدا خصوصا لو اللنك مشتغلش في المستقبل ممكن الرجوع ليه من خلال مواقع ارشيف الانترنت و ساعتها المعلومات اللي زي اسم الكاتب و خلافه بتبقى مهمة جدا. من خلال الرابط دا ممكن تلاقي معلومات اكتر عن الاستشهاد بالمصادر.

بالمانسبة يا اخي. كنت طرحت موضوع للنقاش في مقالة بتروجيت بويكيبديا الانجليزية و رأيك هيبقى مفيد
Osa osa 5 (talk) 02:56, 8 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Walid Soliman.jpg

[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:Walid Soliman.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Fut.Perf. 15:41, 4 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

August 2011

[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to upload media files with false or lacking copyright and source information, you may be blocked from editing. Please make sure you have read and understood our image use policy before making any further uploads. If you have questions, ask at the copyright question page. Fut.Perf. 15:42, 4 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

وليد سليمان

[edit]

وعليكم السلام يا صديقي. يبدو أن الصورة التي أضفتها ستواجه بعض الصعوبات. سياسيات الموسوعة لرفع الصور صعبة بعض الشئ وللأسف لست خبير فيها. ولكن أرى أسهل أمر يمكنك فعله هو بما أنك صديق شخصي لوليد فعليك أن تصوره بنفسك ثم ترفع الصورة تحت رخصة أنها عمل شخصي. أتمنى أن أكون قد أفدتك. تحياتي. --Osa osa 5 (talk) 02:02, 6 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:02, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:11, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Suez.JPG

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Suez.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:32, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:PetroJet Lovers.png

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:PetroJet Lovers.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:26, 3 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]