User talk:Montague Bodkin
Welcome[edit]
|
Montague Bodkin, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]
|
Hi Montague Bodkin! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Come join experienced editors at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a space where new editors can get help from experienced editors. These editors have been around for a long time and have extensive knowledge about how Wikipedia works. Come share your experiences, ask questions, and get advice from experts. I hope to see you there! Jtmorgan (I'm a Teahouse host) This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:17, 23 August 2014 (UTC) |
Hooray! You created your Teahouse profile![edit]
|
Welcome to the Teahouse Badge |
| Awarded to editors who have introduced themselves at the Wikipedia Teahouse. Guest editors with this badge show initiative and a great drive to learn how to edit Wikipedia. | |
| Thank you for introducing yourself and contributing to Wikipedia! If you have any questions feel free to drop me a line at my talk page. Happy Editing! ~ Anastasia [Missionedit] (talk) 20:58, 23 August 2014 (UTC)
| |
Hi Anastasia, I am very pleased to meet you! Thank you for reviewing my teahouse entrance and for bestowing the badge! I love Gamification almost as much as I love something else that you love, too, according to your profile. I have two questions: (1) is it considered bad etiquette to "steal" (or rather borrow and modify) building blocks/templates from other user pages? (2) can I put my first badge on my user page or is it to stay on this talk page? — thank you very much and I'm looking forward to doing some good around here!--Montague Bodkin (talk) 21:59, 23 August 2014 (UTC)
- You're welcome Montague--I'm pleased to meet you, too! No, it's not bad etiquette to "steal" other people's templates and ideas. After all, Wikipedia is all about public domain. I've done it on many an occasion :) However, it is good etiquette to acknowledge somewhere on your userpage that you used another person's idea; some users will get offended if you don't (or at least ask them first before using it). I'm not one of those people, so you can copy and modify all you want off my userpage. And, yes, you can copy-paste the badge I gave you to your userpage; this is a very common practice among Wikipedia editors. I'm glad to see your interest in how Wikipedia works! What is it that you said you have in common with me? Also, I see you know how to use CSS--are you trained in HTML as well? Just wondering. ~ Anastasia [Missionedit] (talk) 23:15, 23 August 2014 (UTC)
- Thank you! I have now created an Acknowledgments section and I will do as you suggested & give thanks where thanks are due. There is SO MUCH to learn here. These are fantastic times. Two things we have in common: love of ישוע & of the color green. Yes, I do know a little HTML & CSS. Take care and bless you!--Montague Bodkin (talk) 16:04, 24 August 2014 (UTC)
- Actually, another QUESTION: The section Trinity#Logical_coherence (found via your Talk page) carries a warning about primary sources. Now, how would one clean up such a section and why? Does the criticism refer to the first paragraph (referenced paraphrasing of Augustine's own words), or to the last paragraph (where several citations are needed)? There is a discussion on the talk page but it ended before the warning was issued...what can be done? I like Augustine's work hence my interest. Cheers!--Montague Bodkin (talk) 17:16, 24 August 2014 (UTC)
- Whoops, sorry it took me so long to reply. The problem is that the section relies mostly on a book called On the Trinity written by Augustine of Hippo. That is considered a primary source per WP:PRIMARY. Articles are supposed to mainly be sourced using secondary sources to ensure unbiased coverage. This sort of problem is difficult to resolve, as the section is necessary part of the article but other supporting sources are difficult to find. If you could find secondary sources to support the text, that might help with the issue. ~ Anastasia [Missionedit] (talk) 02:36, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
- Actually, another QUESTION: The section Trinity#Logical_coherence (found via your Talk page) carries a warning about primary sources. Now, how would one clean up such a section and why? Does the criticism refer to the first paragraph (referenced paraphrasing of Augustine's own words), or to the last paragraph (where several citations are needed)? There is a discussion on the talk page but it ended before the warning was issued...what can be done? I like Augustine's work hence my interest. Cheers!--Montague Bodkin (talk) 17:16, 24 August 2014 (UTC)
- Thank you! I have now created an Acknowledgments section and I will do as you suggested & give thanks where thanks are due. There is SO MUCH to learn here. These are fantastic times. Two things we have in common: love of ישוע & of the color green. Yes, I do know a little HTML & CSS. Take care and bless you!--Montague Bodkin (talk) 16:04, 24 August 2014 (UTC)