If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GFDL, you can comment to that effect on Talk:Mu carvalho. If the article has already been deleted, but you have a proper release, you can reenter the content at Mu carvalho, after describing the release on the talk page. However, you may want to consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you, and please feel free to continue contributing to Wikipedia. --NMChico24 23:48, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Please do not post copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder, as you did to Mu carvalho. See Wikipedia:Copyrights. Copyright violations are unacceptable and persistent violators will be blocked. Your original contributions are welcome. --NMChico24 00:04, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
A tag has been placed on Mu carvalho, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article is a repost of either already posted material, or of material that was previously deleted under Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion. If you can indicate how Mu carvalho is different from all other articles, or if you can indicate why this article should not be deleted, I advise you to place the template {{hangon}}, and also put a note on Talk:Mu carvalho saying why this article should stay. An admin should check for such edits before deleting the article. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Please read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 4 under General criteria. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. We welcome your help in trying to improve Wikipedia, and we ask you to follow these instructions. StoptheDatabaseState 00:29, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This is your last warning. The next time you create an inappropriate page such as Mu carvalho, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --NMChico24 02:43, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The website indicates a copyright at the bottom of the page. If it is your site, you would need to include a disclaimer on the website releasing the content under the GFDL in order for the material to be appropriate for Wikipedia. Simply stating in the article that the material is free is not sufficient. I hope this helps. --NMChico24 03:32, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Also, you could always simply rewrite the content in your own words, which would eliminate the copyright issue altogether. --NMChico24 03:39, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for uploading Image:IMG 5201-1-.JPG. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 04:08, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
Please stop removing maintenance notices from articles when the required changes have not been made. If you continue to disrupt maintenance processes you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Danny Lilithborne 02:39, 26 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Danny Lilithborne 03:50, 26 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
A tag has been placed on Mu Carvalho, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.
For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. —Pilotguy (ptt) 23:42, 26 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
If no one objects to the deletion within five days by removing the "prod" notice, the article may be deleted without further discussion. If you remove the prod notice, the deletion process will stop, but if an editor is still not satisfied that the article meets Wikipedia guidelines, it may be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion for consensus. NickelShoe (Talk) 15:35, 27 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Óleo_Sobre_Tela.jpg listed for deletion[edit]
Disputed fair use rationale for Image:O Pianista do Cinema Mudo.jpg[edit]
Thank you for uploading Image:O Pianista do Cinema Mudo.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.
I have nominated O Pianista do Cinema Mudo, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/O Pianista do Cinema Mudo. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. RoninBKTC 11:32, 9 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned non-free media (Image:O Pianista do Cinema Mudo.jpg)[edit]
Thanks for uploading Image:O Pianista do Cinema Mudo.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:08, 16 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Mu by Mu.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 03:25, 27 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:MUSAS5003.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 13:17, 16 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for uploading Image:O Pianista do Cinema Mudo.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
