Jump to content

User talk:Moondragon21/Archives/2023/February

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Central, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Central constituency.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 10 February 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Carole Crofts for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Carole Crofts is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Carole Crofts until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Uhooep (talk) 10:08, 10 February 2023 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Woman to Woman (campaign)

Hello! Your submission of Woman to Woman (campaign) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! BlueMoonset (talk) 04:18, 14 February 2023 (UTC)

New earthquake victim

Hello, sorry to bother. I've seen you've made several pages and edits related to the Turkey–Syria earthquake. Recently the media announced another victim of the earthquake, Cemal Kütahya. Do you think you could make a page for him? Regards, Super Ψ Dro 22:50, 15 February 2023 (UTC)

St. Paul's Church, Antakya moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, St. Paul's Church, Antakya, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 TT me 14:03, 16 February 2023 (UTC)

Egianus Kogoya moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Egianus Kogoya, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 TT me 14:24, 16 February 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: St. Paul's Church, Antakya (February 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Blaze Wolf was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 21:04, 16 February 2023 (UTC)

Dominican

Hi, when you create categories, please look around carefully to see how neighbouring categories are named. The categories that you created for Dominican women in politics (etc) were ambiguous, because Dominican people can also refer to Dominican Republic, so we use "Dominica women" (etc) in Wikipedia categories. I think I have disambiguated all the relevant pages now, moving your new category pages from "Dominican" to "Dominica", but please have a look round in case I've missed any. Best wishes! – Fayenatic London 23:45, 17 February 2023 (UTC)

An article you recently created, National Palace of Culture, Managua, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 TT me 13:08, 24 February 2023 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Category:Palaces in Nicaragua indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 01:16, 25 February 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Sharon Campbell for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sharon Campbell is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sharon Campbell until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Uhooep (talk) 16:40, 26 February 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Georgina Butler for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Georgina Butler is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Georgina Butler until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Uhooep (talk) 16:43, 26 February 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Andrew Dalgleish (diplomat) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Andrew Dalgleish (diplomat) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andrew Dalgleish (diplomat) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Uhooep (talk) 19:22, 26 February 2023 (UTC)