User talk:Moosebag10

Hello

Meeeee Moosebag10 (chatter) 09:50, 16 July 2024 (EDT)

Welcome!

Hello, Moosebag10, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Bottlenose dolphin did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to The Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! Helpful Raccoon (talk) 19:39, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This was written by ChatGPT. That is true also and it is accurate.

Urs Truly,

—Moosebag10 (chatter) 19:48, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

July 2024

Hello, I'm Oshwah. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Bottlenose dolphin, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 19:53, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is sourced. A secret source.

Urs Truly,

—Moosebag10 (chatter) 19:55, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome, Moosebag10!

Welcome to Wikipedia, Moosebag10! I'm CFA, and I've been assigned as your mentor. About half of new Wikipedia accounts receive a mentor chosen randomly from a list of volunteers. It just means I'm here to help with anything you need! We need to have all kinds of people working together to create an online encyclopedia, so I'm glad you're here. Over time, you will figure out what you enjoy doing the most on Wikipedia.

You might have noticed that you have access to a tutorial and suggested edits. It's recommended that you take advantage of this, as it'll make learning how to edit Wikipedia easier.

If you need assistance with anything or have any questions, click on the "Get editing help" button on the bottom right corner of your screen. This will open up a module with links to help pages and a place to ask me questions. You can also ask me questions directly on my talk page, or go here to get help from the wider community.

Again, welcome to Wikipedia! C F A 💬 20:48, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dear CFA,

Thank you so much for the Wikilove cookie and for agreeing to mentor me on Wikipedia. I am truly grateful for this opportunity to learn from your experience and expertise.

I'm eager to dive deeper into Wikipedia's guidelines and improve my editing skills under your guidance. Your support means a lot to me, and I look forward to our collaboration.

Best regards,

—Moosebag10 (chatter) 21:19, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

July 2024

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Cullen328 (talk) 20:53, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comments like ONE MORE TIME I AM TYING YOU ON A PIÑATA are not acceptable on Wikipedia. Cullen328 (talk) 20:56, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry. Moosebag10 (chatter) 21:05, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Moosebag10 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I made a silly mistake while editing. I am writing to appeal the block placed on my account. I was recently blocked for disruptive editing, and I am seeking clarification on the specific edits or actions that led to this decision. I believe there may have been a misunderstanding or mistake in the application of the block. I am committed to following Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, including those related to neutrality, verifiability, and civility. I value the integrity of Wikipedia as a collaborative platform and strive to contribute constructively to its content. I request an opportunity to discuss the block further and provide any necessary explanations or clarifications. I am eager to resolve any concerns and continue contributing positively to Wikipedia. Thank you for your attention to this matter.

Decline reason:

It would clearly be a serious mistake to lift this block. I very strongly urge you to refrain from all further use of AI on Wikipedia because your next block is very likely going to be indefinite. Yamla (talk) 21:37, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

What would you say is wrong with this edit:[1]? Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 21:07, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

We do not want to read banalities from ChatGPT or similar software. We want to hear from a human being. Precisely what "silly mistake" did you make and what assurances can you provide that you won't make any more silly mistakes? Venting anger against volunteer editors at the Teahouse (or anywhere else) is not permitted. Cullen328 (talk) 21:12, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Wikipedia’s,

Thank you for your feedback. I appreciate your perspective on Pantherpedia and its strengths. It's great to see different platforms contributing positively to knowledge sharing and accessibility.

While Pantherpedia may excel in certain areas, it's important to recognize that Wikipedia also serves a vast global community with its collaborative editing model and extensive content in multiple languages. Both platforms have their strengths and challenges, and each plays a significant role in the digital landscape.

I value your insights and look forward to continued discussions on how various platforms can enhance information accessibility and accuracy for users worldwide.

Best regards and let me by myself,

—Moosebag10 (chatter) 21:17, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Huh? How did you even get ChatGPT to give you this response? Pantherpedia isn't even a thing that exists. C F A 💬 21:19, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It exists as a crystal ball. Moosebag10 (chatter) 21:22, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You can be (not "by") yourself, just not at Wikipedia. Persist, and expect the 31 hour block to be converted to an indefinite block. David notMD (talk) 21:21, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nah, I am just spending times here. Thank you for your interest in Pantherpedia. Pantherpedia is an encyclopedia project developed under Panthermedia, headquartered in Miami, Florida (previously Key West until July 13). It has grown to involve over 1,500 users contributing to its content.

I appreciate the opportunity to clarify this information and look forward to discussing more about Pantherpedia and its contributions.

Best regards,

—Moosebag10 (chatter) 21:26, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think trolling is going to get you unblocked... C F A 💬 21:28, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I wanted to take a moment to clarify why I've been seeking help with writing paragraphs and discussions. Writing cohesively and effectively on Wikipedia has been a challenge for me, especially in conveying my thoughts clearly and within the guidelines of the platform.

I've found that using an AI-powered assistant like ChatGPT helps me organize my thoughts into coherent paragraphs. It assists me in ensuring that my messages are respectful, informative, and aligned with Wikipedia's standards.

By utilizing this tool, I aim to contribute constructively to discussions and improve my communication skills on Wikipedia. I appreciate your understanding and willingness to engage with me during this process.

Thank you for your patience and support.

Best regards,

—Moosebag10 (chatter) 21:29, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for keeping me updated on the ongoing discussion. I appreciate your efforts in ensuring transparency and clarity in this matter.

I'm here to address any concerns or questions that have been raised. Please let me know how I can contribute positively to the discussion and work towards a resolution.

Best regards,

—Moosebag10 (chatter) 21:33, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have written nothing within the guidelines of Wikipedia (all of your edits have been reverted), so if you think AI is helping you write better, it is not. David notMD (talk) 21:38, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked indefinitely

Confirmed to McPanthers Employee, now blocked indefinitely. --Yamla (talk) 21:39, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Yamla (talk) 21:39, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]