Cheat Code Dangers has been proposed for deletion. Please see the article for details. NickelShoe 05:23, 23 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah I know. I saw it. Is there any way I can delete it? I think it's kinda crappy too y'know :-P --Moped 21:59, 23 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
You can put {{db-author}} at the top, but they might not do it for you, since there have been so many editors. Actually, what I'd do is put {{db-reason|I'm the creator of this article and the only contributor of content (see the page history). It's not fit for Wikipedia, and I would like it to be deleted}}, or something like that. So that the admin who checks on it doesn't dismiss the request because there were other editors, since no one else made any contributions of content. But they might decide it's not okay, and you can just wait out the five days. NickelShoe 22:05, 23 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, I think I'll just wait out the 5 days. Thanks anyway. Oh, what did you think of my update to the Shangai World Financial Center page? --Moped 22:07, 23 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Looks all right to me, but I'd honestly never heard of the building....NickelShoe 22:11, 23 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.
Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me, or ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Hunter 04:13, 7 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Please do not make personal attacks on other people. Wikipedia has a policy against personal attacks. In some cases, users who engage in personal attacks may be blocked from editing by admins or banned by the arbitration committee. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Please resolve disputes appropriately. Thank you. --Crossmr 17:12, 7 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Please do not remove warnings from your talk page or replace them with offensive content. Removing or maliciously altering warnings from your talk page will not remove them from the page history. If you continue to remove or vandalize warnings from your talk page, you will lose your privilege of editing your talk page. Thanks. --Crossmr 16:55, 7 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This is your last warning. Removing warnings from your talk page is considered vandalism. You will be blocked from editing Wikipedia and your talk page will be protected from editing if you do it again. --Crossmr 17:10, 7 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Please stop targeting one or more user's pages or talk pages for abuse or insults, unwarranted doctoring or blanking. It can be seen as vandalism and may get you blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Crossmr 16:55, 7 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. -→Buchanan-Hermit™/?! 16:59, 7 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Please do not delete them. Thank you much. Kukini 17:02, 7 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
You have been temporarily blocked from editing for vandalism of Wikipedia. Please note that page blanking, addition of random text or spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, and repeated and blatant violation of WP:NPOV are considered vandalism. If you wish to make useful contributions, you may come back after the block expires. -→Buchanan-Hermit™/?! 17:02, 7 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
If you made this yourself and claim full owndership of the image, then from what I have seen, it looks poorly cropped, pinched lines can be seen, (First Image) and looks like it was taken in a screenshot quality. I can also see the horizontal lines that is on placed on the diagrams (Last image.)
You see because of these observations, I cannot agree with idea that you drew 3 different illustrations of the SWFC in its different form and hereby claiming that it was created by yourself. I happen to be an illustrator in Skyscraperpage.com, and these 3 different illustrations are drawn by the following 3 of varying nicknames; Rick Ruiz, James Raymond and Nightsky. Unless if they grant you the permission and legal rights to use the drawings, then that's fair enough. However it can't be the case as these illustrators I contacted them regarding about the usage of these 3 drawings, have absolutely no idea about their SWFC drawings being used here. And even though they might allow you to use the images, the 3 drawings should not have these visible affects as stated above as it is the illustrator's code of practice to provide the original drawings and should not be screenshot cropped.