Jump to content

User talk:Moppatt O'Smitty

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Moppatt O'Smitty, you are invited to the Teahouse!

[edit]
Teahouse logo

Hi Moppatt O'Smitty! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like 78.26 (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:02, 19 January 2021 (UTC)


Guidelines

[edit]

Please have a look at WP:SPA and WP:COI.—Aquegg (talk) 21:17, 21 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks —Aquegg. I've created a talk at the main Gearspace talk page; I understand the principle of a single topic and indeed have plans to create other pages for overlooked women in audio. With all due respect can you please tell me why you chose to request I refer to these guidelines but not Mhatma who seems in a similar boat with regard focus upon the one issue of removing the one entry?

Speedy deletion nomination of Jenny matthias

[edit]

Hello Moppatt O'Smitty,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Jenny matthias for deletion in response to your request.

If you didn't intend to make such a request and don't want the article to be deleted, you can edit the page and remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

John B123 (talk) 09:37, 22 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yes please delete. I had accidentally created the page with a lowercase surname.

I have also just realized I spelled her first name incorrectly. Therefore I will attempt to recreate the correct page which is Jennie Matthias and not Jenny Matthias. Once finished I will then redirect and delete this page. Can you please confirm this is the correct procedure?

Nomination of Jennie Matthias for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jennie Matthias is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jennie Matthias until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

bradv🍁 21:22, 22 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nile Climate Engine (May 25)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Tagishsimon was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Tagishsimon (talk) 08:19, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Nile Climate Engine

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Moppatt O'Smitty. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Nile Climate Engine, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 09:01, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Moppatt O'Smitty (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Now that I have become more aquainted with rules, procedures and ways of the Wikipedia community, I understand the reasoning behind the decision to block my account. It seems I was too brash, and overly zealous Moppatt O'Smitty (talk) 15:39, 26 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You were blocked for violating WP:SOCK but don't mention this at all in your unblock request. Yamla (talk) 15:54, 26 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.