User talk:MoranRAV4

An editor has expressed a concern that this account may be a sockpuppet of Santos25Q (talk · contribs · logs).
Please refer to editing habits or contributions of the sockpuppet for evidence. This policy subsection may be helpful.

Account information: block log – contribs – logs – abuse log – CentralAuth

User:Santos25Q[edit]

I'm fairly certain that you've been indefinitely blocked under this account and several others. Please honor your word and stop editing the encyclopedia. Your edits aren't constructive and you still do not understand how character names work. A ni Mate 19:48, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

July 2008[edit]

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did to User:AniMate, you will be blocked from editing. A ni Mate 19:05, 6 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for sockpuppetry. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

Gwernol 21:22, 6 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

MoranRAV4 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

What the hell is going on here? I create an account for Wikipedia and then I'm blocked.

Decline reason:

Isn't that always the first defense of the stuffed sock? I am adequately convinced by your edit history and the discussion below. — Daniel Case (talk) 04:42, 7 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Given the common subject area and edits like these, there seems to be a case here. Also relevant are Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Randy Jaiyan and Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Randy Jaiyan. – Luna Santin (talk) 00:22, 7 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]