User talk:MoreWomenOnWiki

Welcome![edit]

Hello, MoreWomenOnWiki!

Welcome to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Getting Started

Tutorial
Learn everything you need to know to get started.

Introduction to contributing

The Teahouse
Ask questions and get help from experienced editors.

The Task Center
Learn what Wikipedians do and discover how to help.

Tips

Don't be afraid to edit! Just find something that can be improved and make it better. Other editors will help fix any mistakes you make.
It's normal to feel a little overwhelmed, but don't worry if you don't understand everything at first—it's fine to edit using common sense.
If an edit you make is reverted, you can discuss the issue at the article's talk page. Be civil, and don't restore the edit unless there is consensus.
Always use edit summaries to explain your changes.
When adding new content to an article, always include a citation to a reliable source.
If you wish to edit about a subject with which you are affiliated, read our conflict of interest guide and disclose your connection.
Have fun! Your presence in the Wikipedia community is welcome.

Happy editing! Cheers, Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 19:28, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Mindy Kaling[edit]

Hey @MoreWomenOnWiki, I saw your edit summary on Mindy Kaling's article about fixing the "Awards and nominations" table, and I found the problem to be that someone had previously removed the "Award" column and also removed the reference rows, causing the errors. I have fixed the problems, and thank you for raising the issue. Also welcome to Wikipedia! Thanks, vistadan 19:49, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much, vistadan! So helpful! Really appreciate the warm welcome and help on my first day using Wikipedia! :-) MoreWomenOnWiki (talk) 19:53, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lauren Blauvelt (May 30)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Chaotic Enby was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Also, I encourage you to join Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red!

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Lauren Blauvelt and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 19:46, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Yes, I actually joined because of them and I picked one of their red links they were looking to have written - that's how I learned who Lauren Blauvelt is. I don't know if there's a way to 'formally' join, but I just put their badge on my user page. I will work on adjusting the tone of Lauren Blauvelt's page; thanks MoreWomenOnWiki (talk) 00:36, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, MoreWomenOnWiki! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 19:46, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to WikiProject Women in Red[edit]

Hello MoreWomenOnWiki! Thank you for your contributions to articles related to women. I would like to invite you to WikiProject Women in Red, a WikiProject focused on creating entries for women's biographies and related topics and assisting contributors who run into difficulties. If you wish to participate, you can sign up under "New registrations", or feel free to ask for assistance on our talk page any time. Thanks again for your contributions! '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk • contribs) 03:56, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the invitation and information! I added myself under new registrations, and look forward to adding more to wikipedia!

(p.s. I do have 2 draft pages awaiting review right now: Norah Weinstein and Lauren Blauvelt in case you want to check them out.)

Thanks! MoreWomenOnWiki (talk) 04:04, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No problem at all! The drafts should be reviewed by another reviewer soon.(I'm a bit busy right now) Anyways, happy editing! '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk • contribs) 04:10, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No worries! I'm not in a rush at all. I just didn't know how it worked, if I was supposed to tell someone or something. Anyway, thank you! MoreWomenOnWiki (talk) 04:31, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

[Getting rid of the giant box about the Gianna Bryant article not being notable, because we successfully got it up there. Yay!]

[getting rid of another giant box about Gianna Bryant, because we got this squared away]

Women in Red[edit]

Hi there, MoreWomenOnWiki, and welcome to Women in Red. I see you have run into trouble with your first biography but it's good to see you have already received some useful help after posting on our talk page. I think you will find it helpful to look at the guidance from our essays, perhaps starting with our Ten Simple Rule. If I can find time, I'll have a look at Gianna Bryant as she certainly seems to warrant a biography. Please let me know if you run into any more difficulties or need assistance. Happy editing!--Ipigott (talk) 12:57, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! As far as I can tell, it looks like people are working on the draft of Gianna Bryant. I don't know if now someone else submits it when they feel it's ready, or if I need to resubmit since I'm the one who started it. To me, it looks like a lot of work has been done, and it seems maybe ready for resubmission to me? But I'll just sit back and leave it to the experts unless I hear otherwise. Thanks again for the note! MoreWomenOnWiki (talk) 15:05, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

As you may have seen, I tried to give a more "Wikipedia" look to the article and have now moved it to Gianna "Gigi" Bryant. If you think I have removed any important items of information, you are of course welcome to include them but it seems to me many details were already incorporated in other articles. I'm happy to see you made such an enthusiastic start on the article yourself. As you begin to appreciate our editing standards, I'm sure you'll make an excellent editor. Just let me know if ever you think I can help you along.--Ipigott (talk) 16:11, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wow, thank you so much! So kind; really appreciate it! MoreWomenOnWiki (talk) 16:50, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red June 2024[edit]

Women in Red | June 2024, Volume 10, Issue 6, Numbers 293, 294, 308, 309, 310

Online events:

New: LGBTQ+ women | Wiki Loves Pride | Women in Music | Alphabet run X, Y & Z

Continuing: #1day1woman | Education (year-long initiative)

Announcements from other communities

Women in Green Good Article Edit-a-thon June 2024 - Going Back in Time
The Wikipedia Library: #1Lib1Ref - May 15th to June 5th

Tip of the month:

Find a Grave is NOT a reliable source (as it is user-generated content). It can be used
to look for biographical clues.

Other ways to participate:

Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications.
Join the conversations on our talkpage.
Help us plan future events and add any general ideas on developing the project.
Follow us on social media:

Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter/X

--Ipigott (talk) 12:57, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Lauren Blauvelt has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Lauren Blauvelt. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 17:13, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! Great note. I changed the first sentence, as you suggested MoreWomenOnWiki (talk) 17:58, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Anna Hoffmann has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Anna Hoffmann. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 17:21, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I've added more to help make the case for notability; thank you! MoreWomenOnWiki (talk) 18:07, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Lauren Blauvelt has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Lauren Blauvelt. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 18:00, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lauren Blauvelt (June 3)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by TheTechie were:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Lauren Blauvelt and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

thetechie@enwiki: ~/talk/ $ 20:58, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Norah Weinstein (June 3)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by TheTechie were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Norah Weinstein and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

thetechie@enwiki: ~/talk/ $ 20:59, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Norah Weinstein[edit]

After a few minor additions, I've moved Norah Weinstein to mainspace. It seems to me she is adequately covered in the sources used. Furthermore, I saw that her business partner Kelly Sawyer Patricof with your assistance already has a biography. With around 200 words of running text, Weinstein is still rather short. You might like to expand it from additional material from the sources already used to bring it up to start class (250 words). As you can see from here, you have now been credited with two new articles. Great start! I'll see if I have time to work on Draft:Lauren Blauvelt tomorrow. Moving the article to mainspace would mean we will have now covered all the Time women listed for 2024. In the meantime, you might like to see if you can make further improvements.--Ipigott (talk) 14:20, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Thank you for writing. Yeah, I actually did the initial draft of Kelly Sawyer Patricof, but I accidentally put it in Simple English Wiki somehow (whoops), and someone was kind enough to copy it over and spruce it up and get it in the mainspace.

Thank you for moving Norah Weinstein to the mainspace. I tried to fill out her article a little more as you suggested above.

That's cool that there's a list of articles we made. I didn't know that until you linked me to it. On that page, do you know what assessment C means?

I did try to clarify the top of Lauren Blauvelt's article to sound more encyclopedic and straightforward. Maybe I just don't understand Wikipedia style yet (though I'm looking around and really trying), but the rest of the article does seem straightforward to me? Yes, she sounds impressive, but she is. Everything seems straightforward and factual to me? So, if you maybe do get a chance to look at it, I'd love your feedback on where you think the issues with informality or non-neutral tone is, so I can hopefully learn for next time.

Thanks again for everything! MoreWomenOnWiki (talk) 20:21, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Anna Hoffmann has been accepted[edit]

Anna Hoffmann, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

BeanieFan11 (talk) 20:00, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]