User talk:Mornelouw

Welcome!

Hello, Mornelouw, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Mazewaxie (talk • contribs) 10:04, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ilse Taurins moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Ilse Taurins, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. The Mirror Cracked (talk) 17:21, 7 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

January 2020

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. N.J.A. | talk 13:47, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Administrator note for more info on this block, see this edit, N.J.A. | talk 14:04, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Why did I get blocked???

Even though I was offline for like months or 2, a user blocked me for "not here for building a encyclopedia" but still I don't think you can make a encyclopedia on this website, because FANDOM only allows you to do these actions I told you. Somebody must tell me why?

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mornelouw (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was offline for 2 months or probably even 1, and I got blocked for no reason! Somebody must unblock me, but just because I was offline doesn't mean that I wasn't building a encyclopedia..

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 13:58, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Draft:Ilse Taurins concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Ilse Taurins, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:24, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Ilse Taurins

Hello, Mornelouw. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Ilse Taurins".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! JMHamo (talk) 11:27, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Mornelouw (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I'm sorry for doing all of this. Back then, I didn't care, but now I've realized that I've made some bad edits (to name some examples, I replaced Microsoft Store with MS Store, which is not the product's name and replaced a perfectly correct (indefinite) article for whatever reason) and just overall didn't improve the quality of the website. Since then, I've learnt the difference between what makes a good and a bad edit, and I will certainly try do to better. Even if it has been 4 years. Mornelouw (talk) 12:12, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Accept reason:

Accepted by NJA below. – bradv 19:16, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

People can certainly change after four years, what edits do you intend to make? 331dot (talk) 18:39, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Mostly just fix blatant spelling mistakes in random articles, replace broken links, etc. I don't want to go through the same editing spree as I did on the 26 October 2019 (which combined with the bad edits, I think was partly the reason I ended up getting blocked in the first place). I want to be slow, and actually think about if my edits are of value. Mornelouw (talk) 06:43, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@NJA: - what are your thoughts about a possible unblock? PhilKnight (talk) 17:10, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Phil, and welcome back Mornelow after 4 years. I've unblocked you, and trust you will take care and make some useful contributions to Wikipedia. All the best, N.J.A. | talk 10:41, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]