Jump to content

User talk:Mosteiros

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome[edit]

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Mosteiros, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date.

Enjoy your Wikipedia experience!

If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome!  —Dabomb87 19:08, 19 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Capitalization conventions[edit]

I noticed that you are adding incorrectly capitalized headings to many Buffy the Vampire Slayer articles. Per Wikipedia:Naming conventions (capitalization), I've changed the ones in "Welcome to the Hellmouth", using sentence case — that is, only the first word and proper nouns are capitalized. I would appreciate it if you fix the remainder of these, so others don't have to.

If you're going to do mass edits to articles like this, please follow Wikipedia style guidelines. You might also want to mention imminent large-scale changes to Buffy articles at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Buffyverse before doing them, as there is much convention that has been established there. Let me know if you have any questions, and thank you for your cooperation. ~ Jeff Q (talk) 23:16, 19 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Changes in the Desperate Housewives articles[edit]

Hi! It's nice to see that you are working on improving the DH articles! However - if you want to do such massive changes as you have been doing some of lately, it is recomended to discuss them first. There are some heavy work behind some of the articles and by doing too much editing before getting to know the thoughts behind... Well, it will cause quite a mess within the articles, most probably cause some irritation, and you will be doing lots of your work in vain - I've undone some of your edits and I think that there will be others doing it, too.

Hopefully you won't get scared off though! The articles need as many serious editors they can get - just please discuss them first.

Hope you understand :) Cheers! Pjär80 00:53, 20 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Honestly - You will get yourself into several edit wars if you keep on going against consensus. Please slow it down. Pjär80 18:57, 20 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't change the Desperate Housewives articles anymore, OK? AdamDeanHall 20:06, 22 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your editing of the Desperate Housewives template is really beginning to annoy me so PLEASE DON'T DO IT AGAIN!!! PERIOD!! AdamDeanHall 18:01, 14 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your changes to BtVS episode articles[edit]

Hi. You seem to be making systematic changes to a bunch of Buffy episodes, most recently Family. However, your edits are arguably replacing useful, organized information from he articles with raw data. Specifically, you are reorganizing the subsections "main cast", "recurring role", and "guest star" into just a near-verbatim copy of the episode credits. This completely erases the distinction between characters from the seasonal story arc (e.g., Glory) and those appearing just in this episode (e.g., Cousin Beth). As far as I can tell, there has been no discussion, let alone consensus, in the WikiProject Buffyverse talk page, or elsewhere, that this is a useful thing to do. Nor is there, to my knowledge, any general, Wikipedia-wide convention that actor information in episode articles should follow the official credits as closely as possible. Please stop the systematic edits, until you are sure that they do in fact reflect consensus. (Of course, systematic corrections, such as fixing "Rosenburg" to "Rosenberg", are always welcome.) Thanks, Hqb 14:48, 20 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:32, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]