User talk:Mostestargue
|
- Nick, Thanks a lot. Mostestargue (talk) 07:42, 2 September 2012 (UTC)
Don't argue too much!
February 2012
[edit]Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Chiam See Tong, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Willdude123 20:48, 5 February 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Willdude123 (talk • contribs)
16 March 2017
[edit]Your accusation by reverting my edit of being politically motivated vandalism is invalid, just because of my ID chosen, I am declaring I have no association with any political party. These are known incidents widely reported by main-stream media. [1] (Removed politically motivated entries by reddotparty who is clearly a sockpuppet created a few days ago to vandalise)
Blocked for sockpuppetry
[edit]This account has been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for sock puppetry per evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Mostestargue. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. Once the block has expired, you're welcome to make useful contributions. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Vanjagenije (talk) 22:08, 27 March 2017 (UTC) |
Mostestargue (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I did not use any sockpuppet. I used a mobile internet, so you may have got my IP wrong. The accuser reddotparty has editwar with me, but I was only trying to maintain WP:NPOV Mostestargue (talk) 05:10, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
Decline reason:
CheckUser checks more than just the IP address. The behavioural evidence is convoluted but strong enough, on top of the technical evidence, to make me doubt the above account. Huon (talk) 22:51, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.