Jump to content

User talk:Mountaincirque/Archive 1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1Archive 2Archive 3

May be of interest

Hi, started a discussion @ Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Football#Infobox- Teams managed regarding the Alan Wright infobox, thought it may be of interest to you whenever it gets some answers. As you can see my opinion on the matter but I'm open to be corrected. Regards Narom (talk) 17:34, 17 May 2013 (UTC)

Benteke

Well, when Benteke was born, it was Zaire not DR Congo. And was the same for 7 years after he was born. I don't think it's needed to repeat "Kinshasa, Zaire" in the body of the text because it's already in the infobox. The Madras (talk) 09:42, 13 June 2013 (UTC)

Point taken, but surely the Kinshasa, DR Congo and Zaire articles will tell you that, it's not the job of the Benteke article! I suppose you could leave the infobox as it is, and put it in the main body? The Madras (talk) 11:04, 13 June 2013 (UTC)

Birmingham event

If you're in or near Birmingham, you may be interested in this event on 15 March. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 21:30, 5 March 2014 (UTC)

NextGen Series

Hi. How many competitions have been just "suspended" and it continues suspended forever? It's always better for the owners to postpone instead of admiting the end of their creations. In fact in last 2 weeks, NextGen organiser said again that there will be a competition soon, suported by the fact of teams like Fulham, but most of all Man. United being out of Champions League, an so out of Youth League.

Ok, NextGen still not abolished, but one year after now, 2 years after, the competition will continue to be just suspended unless the organizers says "it's canceled"?Rpo.castro (talk) 20:51, 23 April 2014 (UTC)

Well, I suppose it is made clear in the text that the tournament is currently suspended, if it does start again next season then we can just remove the 'abolished date'. Thanks. Mountaincirque 09:18, 24 April 2014 (UTC)

Reviewer

Your WP:RFP has been granted. Please be sure to review the Wikipedia:Pending changes page to be familiar with the technical aspects of the process. Happy editing, — xaosflux Talk 18:18, 31 May 2014 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Kevin-Prince Boateng, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 1954 World Cup (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:53, 20 June 2014 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Mountaincirque. You have new messages at Stefan2's talk page.
Message added 20:43, 27 June 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Stefan2 (talk) 20:43, 27 June 2014 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited HKFC International Soccer Sevens, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sergio Escudero. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:22, 12 August 2014 (UTC)

Football statistics

Hi, many thanks for taking some interest in updating the infobox statistics for footballers. It would be useful if you could set the timestamps for the changes at the same time as you change the appearance/goal figures. There is a field name |pcupdate= or |club-update=, usually at the bottom of the template, that should be changed. The equivalent for international matches is |ntupdate= or |nationalteam-update=. All you have to do is replace the contents of the field with 5 tilde characters, ~~~~~, which when saved will be converted into the date/time of the change. Regards. JMHamo (talk) 13:02, 29 September 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Aidan Grant

The article Aidan Grant has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Has not played first team football in a fully professional league, so fails WP:NFOOTBALL and WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JMHamo (talk) 18:52, 30 September 2014 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Aidan Grant, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Southern League. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 1 October 2014 (UTC)

File:Didcot, town centre.jpg

Hi, did you take this photo today? --Redrose64 (talk) 12:35, 7 October 2014 (UTC)

@Redrose64: A couple of weeks ago, is it ok?. Mountaincirque 12:42, 7 October 2014 (UTC)
The reason that I ask is because you put today's date into the |date= parameter, and the weather in the photo doesn't match the weather in Didcot today: in the photo, there are strong shadows, hardly any cloud, and the person just left of centre (facing camera) is wearing a short-sleeve shirt; but today, there isn't much sunlight - there are too many clouds, and it's windy and quite cool. The |date= parameter is supposed to be the date when the picture was created; it also affects whether I put the pic into c:Category:September 2014 in Oxfordshire or c:Category:October 2014 in Oxfordshire. --Redrose64 (talk) 13:31, 7 October 2014 (UTC)
It was last month, I have corrected the date now, when I uploaded it the field said date taken or first published, so I took the first published day to be today. Thanks for the info! Mountaincirque 13:34, 7 October 2014 (UTC)
I take it that you used the Upload Wizard on commons - I've never successfully used this: it's slow, the interface is horrible, and when unexpected things happen it's very difficult to work out why. Today, I can't even get as far as the bit where you enter the date, so I can't check on what it asks for. But if it does say "first published", that's for images that were obtained from another website, such as Geograph.
Anyway. Do you live in or near Didcot? There is a Wikipedia Meetup every month in Oxford; the next one is on 19 October. --Redrose64 (talk) 14:16, 7 October 2014 (UTC)

Reference Errors on 13 November

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 01:02, 14 November 2014 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Låpsley (musician), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Electronic. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:09, 29 November 2014 (UTC)

info and tips

info and tips
Hi, nice to meet you!! I saw that you created the wiki page of singer James Bay. I would like to ask you how you did, because I discovered him online, and I really want to make an Italian wiki page of him, can you give som wiki tips? Random Team (talk) 18:03, 13 January 2015 (UTC)

Updating Aston Villa Players for 2014-15

I'm relatively new here, and i'm on here to help with football articles, just wondering if you could help me out with updating a few of our beloved villa players summaries. Also, how do you get the user boxes? That's probably a silly question. Cheers -Kyle — Preceding unsigned comment added by AVHolloway (talk • contribs) 12:12, 20 January 2015 (UTC)

a Didcot

Hi, re this revert - it is fictitious - an online search probably won't turn up this book, which AFAIK is the only place where it's mentioned:

  • Adams, Douglas; Lloyd, John (1983). The Meaning of Liff. London: Pan Books. p. 39. ISBN 978-0-330-28121-8.

Can't tell you the page, I've misplaced my copy. Stephen Fry was caught out by John Lloyd in an episode of QI when Lloyd fed him this "fact". --Redrose64 (talk) 14:58, 11 February 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Aidan Grant for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Aidan Grant is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aidan Grant until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. JMHamo (talk) 10:41, 26 April 2015 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Rudy Gestede, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page United States of America men's national football team. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:42, 4 August 2015 (UTC)

Michael Beasley (bishop)

Hi, I noticed you changed the article Michael Beasley (bishop) to say that he was Deputy Director of the Partnership for Child Development. I have reverted this edit because you didn't provide a reference. Currently, the references used state he was Director of the Partnership for Child Development. If you can find one that states he was only Deputy Director, feel free to change thus again. Gaia Octavia Agrippa Talk 15:12, 11 August 2015 (UTC)

Sorry for being lazy, he was the acting director for the group for a year or so but was deputy director for most of his time there, the paragraph read that he was director for 7 years (2003-2010) which is factually incorrect, he was only director in 2009-10. One ref is: http://www.westcott.cam.ac.uk/uploads/News/Westcott_review_2007-8.pdf which notes that he was deputy director in 2008. I will add when I have time. Mountaincirque 15:19, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
Okay. Feel free to correct it when you can. I was just going off what the source I had said. Thanks, Gaia Octavia Agrippa Talk 17:14, 11 August 2015 (UTC)

George Ramsay

Hello. When reading the Ramsay article, the first thing I noticed was the bit about how he joined Villa was missing, so the text didn't make any sense; I quickly bunged in some unsourced text so it would at least read OK. I've now added a source which should suffice. You're right, the article is sorely lacking in references – I'll see if I can come up with some more. Jellyman (talk) 11:23, 23 October 2015 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Loyle Carner, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Radio 1. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:02, 14 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:58, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Aidan Grant concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Aidan Grant, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:32, 17 January 2016 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Didcot, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page NHS. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:19, 22 March 2016 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Aston Villa F.C.
added a link pointing to Mervyn King
Harper Adams University
added a link pointing to University College

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:55, 14 April 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Garden town (disambiguation) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Garden town (disambiguation) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Garden town (disambiguation) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 04:37, 2 July 2016 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Garden city movement, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page North Essex. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:27, 3 July 2016 (UTC)

Thank you for the welcome

Hi Mountaincirque,

Just wanted to thank you for the pleasant welcome message that you left on my talk page :)

Regards, Acapital (talk) 18:55, 15 July 2016 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Acapital (talk • contribs) 18:52, 15 July 2016 (UTC)

James Chester

You could always revert my revert and add the reference before you click 'Save'? I did the right thing by removing unsourced content from a BLP article. It's not that big a deal. – PeeJay 14:59, 12 August 2016 (UTC)

You're right, it's by the rulebook, but what does that add to the encyclopedia? You made it incorrect. It just seemed like a lazy editing choice, no offense. It's easy to RV, but it would have taken you a minute longer to just add a section and ref, or alternatively just leave it and they would have been added by others. Mountaincirque 15:04, 12 August 2016 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Tony Yeboah, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Enfield. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:48, 1 October 2016 (UTC)

Sanchin Talk

Goeth thou to the TALK page for Sanchin to raise specific objections with regards to references. The articles linked are different and, for that magazine, not at all terrible. Nevertheless, there are other published references available which can be added IF you specify WHAT claims you feel the articles fail to support. TheDoctorX (talk) 01:53, 10 October 2016 (UTC)

I really don't like your tone, especially USING CAPS. I made the revert in good faith, the page had been tagged as requiring a ref improve for two years and by adding one very poor reference (no publisher, no URL, no page number) for one section of the article that did not in my opinion result in the article not requiring better referencing. For instance the lead of the article uses the Black Belt magazine reference, having reviewed that it makes no mention whatsoever of Tam Hon, Ang Lian-Huat or the details on the use of nukite zuki or Goju ryu. Basically, it is a mass of original research loosely associated to one decent reference (bizarrely also it is repeat referenced multiple times which should be corrected). The whole thing needs a re-write based on that one source as the rest is unreliable. As for the section on shime, who knows whether that reference is correct as it is so sparse and of little use to those ho don't want to google the book and spend time trawling through for themselves. I'm happy to go through and use [citation needed].
I would argue that you are the one that needed to go to the talk page to justify why the very minor information you added justified the removal of a long-standing tag on the article. All in all, I'm unsure why you are so adamant that this article is perfect as it is. I'm sure there are many references around for this well-known kata which is prominent in shito-ryu and shukokai as well as the styles mentioned here without reference (Uechi ryu aside). Having ref improve tags makes it more likely that editors stopping by will improve this article, making it more useful for everyone. Mountaincirque 13:06, 10 October 2016 (UTC)

"Cultivate, dear Zilkov, a sense of humor."

Perhaps you should not use "ALLCAPS" as well, but perhaps best to understand its legitimate use of emphasis. Absent remains any specifics requested. I suppose it is hard it is to pick up a book and read it; nevertheless, linking to a page that violates copyright remains unhelpful as is the rest of your screed.

Since you contribute nothing but your imagined offense, I shall waste no further time with you.TheDoctorX (talk) 14:06, 10 October 2016 (UTC)

_____

Though I shall note, "en passant," that the copyright holder has filed a complaint against the URL you offered as a reference. Thus ends the lesson. TheDoctorX (talk) 19:08, 10 October 2016 (UTC)


_____


"Like a bloody opera singer . . . always back for her 'Final Performance!'"

--"Old Tom," Rumpole of the Bailey

1. Copyright Violation: was a copyright violation. Period. The holder has taken action against the site you linked. After "seven years" or even a few days you should know the rules of not just Wiki but, well, the United States and other relevant jurisdictions. Wiki helpfully provides a warning regarding copyright violation on pretty much every page. You should read it.

2. References: this is how it is done, son. On online and terrestrial scholarly works. Books do not always have a "url." Yet despair not, there are these things called "libraries." Or you can use this thing I hear the kids tell about called the "internets" or something where you can, like, put in titles and authors and Amazon[Tm.--Ed.] or even The Googleplex links to books where one may purchase with monetary units or--Heavens to Betsy--arrange to have a local library borrow it from another library connected through this "internets" thing.

Nevertheless, had you behaved as an adult and complied with the Kind and Measur'd in Manner and Speech request to ASK for SPECIFICS--oh noes! All caps! What about the children?!--you would have been provided with it.

You did not.

So I will not bother reading your the remainder of your temper-tantrum attempt to pretend you were not wrong and did not violate both Wiki rules and actual laws. You contributed nothing relevant otherwise and consistently refuse to do so.

This concludes this correspondence, which I did not initiate, but I terminate with satisfaction. TheDoctorX (talk) 13:29, 12 October 2016 (UTC)

Suggestion

Thank you for the Olive Branch regarding the discussion on Sanchin, and please accept mine for my "rhetoric a trifle on the harsh side of strict." Perhaps we can dump this entire discussion and just pretend it did not happen?

TheDoctorX (talk) 03:37, 13 October 2016 (UTC)

Autopatrolled granted

Hi Mountaincirque, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the "autopatrolled" permission to your account, as you have created numerous, valid articles. This feature will have no effect on your editing, and is simply intended to reduce the workload on new page patrollers. For more information on the patroller right, see Wikipedia:Autopatrolled. Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing! Beeblebrox (talk) 19:47, 7 November 2016 (UTC)

Rollback granted

Hi Mountaincirque. After reviewing your request for "rollbacker", I have enabled rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback:

  • Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
  • Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
  • Rollback should never be used to edit war.
  • If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
  • Use common sense.

If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! Beeblebrox (talk) 23:56, 7 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Mountaincirque. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Aidan Grant

Hello, Mountaincirque. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Aidan Grant".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Zupotachyon Ping me (talk ⋅ contribs) 00:48, 7 January 2017 (UTC)

Spurs honours

There is a reason why it's down on Tottenham page, you can't trust other pages, websites all the time, if you goto the Tottenham museum you will see some information about that game and the trophy. Govvy (talk) 18:17, 5 February 2017 (UTC)

Hi, I was referring to published books which state that the match was not competed for that season, these are histories of the Corinthians football club that played in all but one of the ties. Your personal experience of the Spurs museum is not a suitable reference for Wikipedia, they may have got confused themselves as the Shield match was held in 1934 at end of that season, not the start of the 1934-35 season, there are programmes available online. If you leave that information for 1935 on there you are claiming a trophy that was never played for and basically 'inflating' the number of minor honours Spurs have won. If you have any reference, who they played, the score then please do include it. Do you not think it's odd though that it wouldn't be mentioned anywhere? I suggest you read the Sheriff of London Charity Shield page and look at the results there which are heavily referenced from newspapers and other reliable sources.

Mountaincirque 14:53, 6 February 2017 (UTC)

Wow, you sound angry, is that why you posted a good faith reprimand on my talk page, because that's really out of order and I find that offensive. I refer to Tottenham's website, why on earth would they get information wrong on that note. I used it as a citation and you ignored that as the source of the information. If you have a problem with their information on their website why don't you email them instead of being rude to me. Govvy (talk) 15:11, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
You have removed a warning from your own talk page which is considered vandalism. You have reverted edits and not used any citations. Mountaincirque 16:19, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
@Govvy: I have been in email contact with the Spurs club historian today and he confirmed that there was an error on their site. He reviewed all programmes and fixture lists in the club record for the 1933-35 seasons. He has now removed the listing for the Shield win in 1934-35 which was in fact a friendly match ([1]). I hope that the error can now be removed from the Spurs wiki page? I'm sorry if you found my messages in any way offensive, I was merely pointing out that the information was not referenced and that many other sources disagreed with the claim. I would gently advise you to take a little more time and research before reverting other registered editors' edits, I am happy to rescind the warning I posted on your page to lay this to rest. Mountaincirque 14:13, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
I guess you fixed it then, I tend to go by what I see on websites and Tottenham Hotspur are normally pretty straight and reliable. Out of interest, what's the email address for the historian at Tottenham? Govvy (talk) 15:35, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
I contacted him through the form on the club website with an 'FAO Club Historian', his name is John Fennelly. I won't post his email address here in the public domain as it's not listed on the club website. Mountaincirque 12:36, 9 February 2017 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Queen's Park F.C., you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page First Division. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:42, 10 March 2017 (UTC)

A pie for you!

Thank you for welcome message and here is a pie for you Linda Yeleussizova (talk) 10:20, 7 April 2017 (UTC)

A kitten for you!

Something to cheer you up.

Govvy (talk) 21:41, 27 April 2017 (UTC)

@Govvy: Thanks, I really needed that. Mountaincirque 08:56, 28 April 2017 (UTC)

@Govvy please help somehow, more comments and reverts today. The logic and interpretation of 'personal research' is just incredibly wrong. Mountaincirque 09:17, 3 May 2017 (UTC)

Danny Welbeck

Yes, I would. You have no evidence that Welbeck was one of the 30 people who were given a medal. As I said to User:Govvy, I agree that the evidence suggests that he probably did, but there's nothing concrete either way, and without anything that explicitly states that he got a medal, I wouldn't consider him a winner. I don't know where you're from, but typically, in English football, one has to be involved in the final to be considered a winner. That's why Roy Keane doesn't consider himself to have ever won the Champions League. – PeeJay 13:05, 11 May 2017 (UTC)

I'm happy to leave the page as it is but I don't agree with your stance. As Arsenal were awarded 30 medals, they undoubtedly gave those to all players who played or were on the bench during the cup campaign. The previous season there was press coverage over Szczesny having received a medal with zero games played [2].
These are the formal rules of the FA Cup competition which state nothing about players being only awarded a medal if they play the final [3].
A final point, as Arsenal were awarded 30 medals to give out as they see fit, you will need a source for every player's medals, there is no distinction in the rules for players playing the final e.g. Arsenal could technically decide to award a medal to a player who did not play (due to injury) over a player who did play. Roy Keane may not consider himself a Champions League winner but Man U gave him a winner's medal from their allocation. Mountaincirque 13:15, 11 May 2017 (UTC)
Perhaps Roy Keane was a bad example since he was part of Manchester United's 25-man squad for the Champions League that season, and hence we know he would have got a medal. But since there is no process for naming a squad for the FA Cup as a whole, there's no evidence that Danny Welbeck was one of the 30 who got a medal for the 2015 win. If he ascended the steps and picked up a medal from the Royal Box, that would be evidence, but simply saying "Arsenal get 30 medals, and Welbeck played in a couple of games before the final so he must have got one" is not a good standard of evidence. – PeeJay 15:22, 11 May 2017 (UTC)

The Szczesny link hardly qualifies for the argument in question either since he was a sub in the cup final, meaning he got a medal. Davefelmer (talk) 22:47, 11 May 2017 (UTC)

The FA give out 30 medals for the club to decide, those given at the ceremony are part of that allocation and are technically (see official rules above) given to the club not specific players. Being part of the match day final squad has zero official basis in the FA Cup rules for definitely receiving a medal. There is no reference for 'all match day XI and bench get medals by default', that is your own research. The only source for Szczezny's medal is that article which proves the club granted him one.
I'm going to butt out of medals/honours discussions from now apart from for the couple of general club honours pages I watch. For me any player that has played in a club's victorious cup campaign deserves that honour listed on their list, the details of games they played and whether they were in the final day match squad can be noted in the article or as a note. Was Danny Welbeck part of Arsenal's 2014-15 FA Cup winning squad: undoubtedly yes, was Welbeck one of their major contributors players in the competition, scoring the winner against Manchester United in the quarter finals: yes, apparently he doesn't hold the 'honour' on his CV though despite lifting the trophy as he was injured on the final day. If someone who doesn't know much about football comes across this article and wonders did Welbeck win the FA Cup with Arsenal in 2015?, I currently do not think they have the right information on the page. Mountaincirque 10:11, 15 May 2017 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Original Barnstar
Hi Mountaincirque, thanks for your comments regarding my contributions to pages associated with International Volunteering. I'm still learning and appreciate the feedback. Ccrpettigrew (talk) 09:29, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
@Ccrpettigrew-warmly received, let me know if I can help with anything further, I have worked on that page for a while and it is a topic I am very familiar with Mountaincirque 08:31, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Football/Archive 109

Please do NOT post in talk page archives, and please do NOT post people's email addresses. GiantSnowman 18:41, 26 May 2017 (UTC)

I already apologised for posting in the archive, almost immediately in fact. I have never done that before and had no knowledge of the rule before today. I also have no knowledge of a no email address rule, I made it clear in my email to Arsenal that I wanted the information to share with an ongoing discussion among editors and the address is in the public domain. I find your tone unnecessarily rude and definitely not assuming good faith. Mountaincirque 18:55, 26 May 2017 (UTC)

What do you think?

I have started adding sources to Enshin kaikan and Gigō Funakoshi do you think Vernon Bell should be created as he introduced Karate to the UK. Dwanyewest (talk) 21:30, 7 July 2017 (UTC)

@Dwanyewest: sorry, I was away for a long weekend. I have looked up Vernon Bell and I'm not sure personally, I can see one or two minor passing references in books (Google), I think ultimately it would be an ambition to have a "Karate in the United Kingdom" article and he would be mentioned at the beginning of that. Thanks for your work on Enshin kaikan and Gigō Funakoshi, I will watch those too. Please add any other tasks to the 'to do' on the task force page and hopefully we can use the talk page there to discuss also. Mountaincirque · Join the Karate Task Force? 09:22, 12 July 2017 (UTC)

Just thinking about Karate articles I think Karate in the United States, Karate in Japan as well as Karate in the United Kingdom would be viable articles what do you think? As I believe there is plently of good third person sources to support all three. Dwanyewest (talk) 09:30, 12 July 2017 (UTC)

Honours tables

@Mountaincirque: Hi Mountaincirque, I became concerned there was too much duplicated information in the Ongoing Honours table on List of football clubs in England by competitive honours won, so I designed a new table that keeps two of the totals, but has a slightly different purpose. If you have any thoughts, I'd love to hear them. Thought I'd better ask you here to save it getting sidetracked. Madshurtie (talk) 13:37, 1 October 2017 (UTC)

@Madshurtie: I see what you've done, my only disagreement is on the word 'partial', I'd go for disaggregated myself as I don't think the term 'partial honours' makes sense as such. I'm behind what you're trying to do for the page. Mountaincirque · Join the Karate Task Force? 09:19, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
I did a minor rephrase to make it clear partial applied to totals not honours. Let me know if you think it needs rewording again. Madshurtie (talk) 21:22, 2 October 2017 (UTC)

"Peacocking"

Hello. Was honestly surprised by your edit summary... That piece of prose stemmed from a discussion now at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Football/Archive 103#Should we have duplicate records lists for clubs? about where why and whether to list friendly and minor honours, that drifted into the undesirability of excluding from an encyclopedia things like early County Cups because they aren't important now so never could have been. Which encouraged me to give context to the early County Cup win, when it was still a first-team competition. Sorry you thought it was "peacocking". cheers, Struway2 (talk) 10:04, 27 October 2017 (UTC)

@Struway2: sorry if it came across as snappy. As it was a single 1905 honour it just seemed odd to me that there was a long sentence explaining how county cups were important before league fixtures began (1888?). I fully support county honours being included but that sentence seemed out of place to me in the context of Birmingham City's honours, feel free to partially revert/rewrite. All the best Mountaincirque · Join the Karate Task Force? 11:28, 27 October 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Mountaincirque. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Your signature

Please be aware that your signature uses deprecated <font> tags, which are causing Obsolete HTML tags lint errors. Also, the user talk color was not working because it had two # characters where there is supposed to be only one.

You are encouraged to change

[[User:Mountaincirque|<span style="color:#A2A3BF">'''Mountain'''</span>]]<sup>[[User_talk:Mountaincirque|<span style="color:##008080">'''cirque'''</span>]] · [[WP:WikiProject Karate|<font color="Green">Join the Karate Task Force?</font>]]</sup> : Mountaincirque · Join the Karate Task Force?

to

[[User:Mountaincirque|<b style="color:#A2A3BF">Mountain</b>]]<sup>[[User_talk:Mountaincirque|<b style="color:#008080">cirque</b>]] · [[WP:WikiProject Karate|<span style="color:Green">Join the Karate Task Force?</span>]]</sup> : Mountaincirque · Join the Karate Task Force?

If you want the talk page link black instead of teal, try this:

[[User:Mountaincirque|<b style="color:#A2A3BF">Mountain</b>]]<sup>[[User_talk:Mountaincirque|<b style="color:#000">cirque</b>]] · [[WP:WikiProject Karate|<span style="color:Green">Join the Karate Task Force?</span>]]</sup> : Mountaincirque · Join the Karate Task Force?

—Anomalocaris (talk) 06:59, 11 January 2018 (UTC) Mountaincirque

You updated your signature to

[[User:Mountaincirque|<span style="color:#A2A3BF">'''Mountain'''</span>]]<sup>[[User_talk:Mountaincirque|<span style="color:##008080">'''cirque'''</span>]]</sup> : Mountaincirque

Thank you for updating your signature. Please be aware that the talk page color has no effect because the pound character is not supposed to be doubled. If you want the talk page color to work, change it to:

[[User:Mountaincirque|<span style="color:#A2A3BF">'''Mountain'''</span>]]<sup>[[User_talk:Mountaincirque|<span style="color:#008080">'''cirque'''</span>]]</sup> : Mountaincirque

Which can be further simplified to:

[[User:Mountaincirque|<b style="color:#A2A3BF">Mountain</b>]]<sup>[[User talk:Mountaincirque|<b style="color:#008080">cirque</b>]]</sup> : Mountaincirque

—Anomalocaris (talk) 02:48, 19 February 2018 (UTC)

WikiProject Cryptozoology Emergency

Just thought I'd give everyone that's a member of WikiProject Cryprozoology a heads up. I've been seeing a lot of that looks like vandalism by Bloodoffox, removing cryptozoology categories and rewording things to appear as though article topics are on mythological creatures. I believe this is an attempt to get his merger proposal for List of Cryptids merged with List of mythological creatures although I cannot be sure. You might want to give your input here--Paleface Jack 02:54, 22 April 2018 (UTC)

A cup of coffee for you!

Thanks for nixing The Tourist thing on Alex Garland. Had you read any rumors about that? Couldn't find anything. But it's interesting if true. PcPrincipal (talk) 19:26, 22 June 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Mountaincirque. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Tottenham honours

Wanted to double check if you have matched List of football clubs in England by competitive honours won with List of Tottenham Hotspur F.C. records and statistics#Honours. Cheers, Govvy (talk) 09:47, 18 April 2019 (UTC)

Thanks, I did check there as the main source. The criteria are tighter on the competitive honours page and in the Spurs main page editors' wisdom they have not listed Sheriff of London Charity Shield and Anglo-Italian Cup wins in their main honours, despite these both being FA-backed honours. The sums were wrong so I tweaked the honours, all the break-down can be seen in the tables below in that article. Cheers, 09:50, 18 April 2019 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Toby Vintcent, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Conservative Party (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:06, 18 May 2019 (UTC)

Mountaincirque's Talk Page

Comments are very welcome:

Can you send me "fire and blood" book? Fitsum44 (talk) 11:38, 5 August 2019 (UTC)

Mole Day!

Hello! Wishing you a Happy Mole Day on the behalf of WikiProject Science.

Sent by Path slopu on behalf of WikiProject Science and its related projects.

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:00, 23 October 2019 (UTC)

Thoughts on Gyaku-zuki

Do you think Gyaku-zuki should be linked to its German equivalent article and also do you think Gyaku zuki should be redirected to Gyaku-zuki. What do you think? Dwanyewest (talk) 12:59, 12 November 2019 (UTC)

I have just looked at both Gyaku-zuki and Tsuki, I would merge the small amount of content from the first into the second (and trim as it over-complicates the description of the technique in my opinion). I don't think it is really worthy of having it's own page separate from oi-zuki for example. Mountaincirque 10:12, 13 November 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:15, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Wong shadow, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages British and American (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 11:06, 14 February 2020 (UTC)

Alan Birch

If moving a page like Alan Birch to a disambiguated new location, it would be helpful if you were to also turn the previous location into a disambig page, as having it as a redirect to the new location is pointless. You also need to fix broken links. I've done all this for you. GiantSnowman 11:53, 7 August 2020 (UTC)

Apologies and thanks for tidying that up, I was careless with that edit. Mountaincirque 09:05, 11 August 2020 (UTC)

Billy Clarke (footballer, born 1878)

A lot of web sources I see use 'Billy', so it's probably best to have a discussion using WP:RM. GiantSnowman 15:10, 9 September 2020 (UTC)

Thanks, I have proposed that now, all published works on him use 'Willie', there are at least three books. Mountaincirque 15:52, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
An admin will be around shortly to close the discussion. GiantSnowman 17:19, 17 September 2020 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited John Postle Heseltine, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page National Portrait Gallery.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:17, 7 October 2020 (UTC)

My edits

Hello and thanks for your messages. Sorry I've taken a few days to reply. I am totally new to this and totally lost. I am updating my boss's page. It was out of date and not comprehensive so needs updating. However I understand that I have made errors and would like to correct those. Can you possibly clearly identify what needs to be corrected and I will do so?? Thanks again Warcanbrisox (talk) 12:37, 16 November 2020 (UTC)

@Warcanbrisox: don't worry. A couple of things here, firstly, referencing. You cannot just add a line of text that says "X likes mountain-climbing" and press 'save changes', unless it is already referenced on the page (so if it's on the subjects staff profile for example which is already referenced then it's fairer usage). You need to click the 'Cite' drop-down menu and select the 'Templates' menu to add a reference for that information e.g. 'Who's Who 10th Edition etc. etc.' You cannot just add things that you 'know' either, especially if it i they need to be found elsewhere just like if you were writing an academic piece of work. Otherwise it is classed as 'original research' which is not allowed as this is meant to be a sourced encyclopedia.
Secondly, you mention that you have a close work relationship with this subject, this is also a conflict of interest, there are a number of reasons not to edit your own page or your employer's page, one that jumps to mind is potential reputational damage if it is discovered that staff of the subject or the subject themself had edited their own page to highlight desirable topics and remove non-desirable topics. I'm not making that accusation here of you, I can see your edits are quite basic and genuine but you have strayed a couple of times into language that is not quite the right tone for an encyclopedia. In your case I would consider it OK to go in and review text you have added recently and add a reference for anything that isn't referenced. Then I would take a break as making repeated edits over a longer period of time is more likely to end up in the edits being reverted in my opinion. Mountaincirque 13:00, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
@Mountaincirque: thanks so much I really appreciate your help. I'll print out the entry as it currently appears and mark up all the places I think need referencing. Then I'll find the references if I can - this could take some time! I totally understand all your points about conflict and the language comes from various bios that are regularly used for him in by various organisations - not me! Most of it is very basic as you say but I think I can identify the parts the a 'not quite the right tone'. I shall deal with those first.
If you don't mind I will contact you after I've done as much as I think I can on referencing and see what your advice is at that point.Warcanbrisox (talk) 15:42, 16 November 2020 (UTC)

Edit warring

I beg your pardon sir or madam, but I am not edit-warring. In fact I am a participant on the talk page which you ignored when you reverted my edit. That talk page discussion suggested removal, endorsed by at least two of us, which is why I made the WP:BOLD move. Please get your facts straight before diving in headfirst. Elizium23 (talk) 17:06, 20 November 2020 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Mountaincirque/Archive_1&oldid=1146473004"