User talk:Mr.Clown/Archive 1

Talk:Hirohito#RFC:_Appropriate_Emperor_Name

An RFC on content you have commented on has opened, comments are welcome. MBisanz ^talk 01:49, 6 January 2008 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for your vigilance in reverting the vandalism on my user page, it is much appreciated! --Storkk (talk) 17:39, 6 July 2008 (UTC)

I second that. Thanks for reverting the vandalism to my user page as well. →Wordbuilder (talk) 13:41, 9 July 2008 (UTC)

Chinese cash

You have previously participated in discussions of the title of the article Chinese wén. If you care, please discuss a resolution of this issue by suggesting your preferred title at Talk:Chinese wén. — AjaxSmack 01:58, 31 July 2008 (UTC)

Re: Thanks

No Problem! °≈§→ Robomaeyhem ←§≈° 03:13, 29 October 2008 (UTC)

talk page

Hi Mr. Clown, was just curious about making edits to your own talk pages. I read in the guidlines that warnings and other such things can be removed once they have been read. I would appreciate it if you could clarify the rules on this for me please. Thanks 211.28.135.216 (talk) 11:19, 4 November 2008 (UTC)

This user is curious, because I have been restoring his\her warnings. I have done this because the user has been removing warning from socks and suspected sock accounts. I believe this information to be important for other users to be aware of. Let me know if you have any questions for me (either of you), as I would be more then happy to provide feed back. Thank you for your time, MatthewYeager 11:21, 4 November 2008 (UTC)

I am not entirely certain of the policies myself, but I agree with Matthew's reasoning that the warnings are current and relevant, besides, since I don't think you are the blocked user, how do you know the user had read it? Mr.Clown (talk) 11:29, 4 November 2008 (UTC)

Hello

You seem to be making unconstructive reverts to my constructive changes, please refrain from doing this. Thankyou in advance. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Danielclancy (talk • contribs) 12:35, 9 February 2009 (UTC)

Please read my reply in your talk page. Mr.Clown (talk) 12:46, 9 February 2009 (UTC)

ps. As rediculous as it sounds, adding three perfectly good sections and alumni does not constitute vandalism http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vandalism may help you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Danielclancy (talk • contribs) 13:04, 9 February 2009 (UTC)