User talk:Mr. Asian

This is Mr. Asian's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: B. K. Sharma (September 1)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Lopifalko was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Does not say whether he held a political position or not. From sources it appears he was only a candidate.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:B. K. Sharma and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:B. K. Sharma, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Lopifalko (talk) 08:47, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Mr. Asian! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Lopifalko (talk) 08:47, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Separation of Chhattisgarh (September 1)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia.

This submission appears to be taken from cgtotal.pald.in/AboutCgEngl. Wikipedia cannot accept material copied from elsewhere, unless it explicitly and verifiably has been released to the world under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license or into the public domain and is written in an acceptable tone—this includes material that you own the copyright to. You should attribute the content of a draft to outside sources, using citations, but copying and pasting or closely paraphrasing sources is not acceptable. The entire draft should be written using your own words and structure. Note to reviewers: do not leave copyright violations sitting in the page history. Please follow the instructions here.

You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.

Draft:Separation of Chhattisgarh may be deleted at any time unless the copied text is removed. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page. or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

ASUKITE 15:37, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: B. K. Sharma (September 1)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Iamfarzan was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:B. K. Sharma and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:B. K. Sharma, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Iamfarzan (talk) 16:08, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

September 2021[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Chhattisgarh have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Chhattisgarh was changed by Mr. Asian (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.914278 on 2021-09-02T06:37:58+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 06:38, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Brij Kishore Sharma has been accepted[edit]

Brij Kishore Sharma, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Dan arndt (talk) 07:01, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Brij Kishore Sharma[edit]

The politician elected from Hawa Mahal to the Rajasthan Assembly is more notable than the author/poet. All the sources cited in your original draft referred to this individual not a author/poet. Dan arndt (talk) 07:11, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You will need to create a separate article for Draft:Brij Kishore Sharma (author) and it will need to address the requirements of WP:NAUTHOR before it is accepted. 07:18, 3 September 2021 (UTC)

If the only references are book retail websites etc - then he doesn't satisfy WP:NAUTHOR and the article is not likely to be approved. Sources need to be about the author. Dan arndt (talk) 07:24, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If that is all the evidence you have then he is not likely to meet Wikipedia's standards for notability. 07:30, 3 September 2021 (UTC)

There is no evidence to show that they are one and the same person. 07:43, 3 September 2021 (UTC)

Based on the picture you have provided the author and the politician are clearly different people - if you keep on making changes that have no supporting sources I will have to identify your edits as vandalism and if you persist then it make result in you being blocked from further editing. If you wish to discuss any proposed changes then I would suggest that in future you identify the issue on the article's talk page not my talk page. Dan arndt (talk) 08:49, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]