User talk:Mr. Oobergoober

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia by creating the page Urgurburgerfurger. Your test worked, and the page that you created has been or soon will be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. NawlinWiki (talk) 18:29, 28 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of "Swamp moss"[edit]

A page you created, Swamp moss, has been tagged for deletion in accordance with our deletion policy. In particular, it meets one or more criteria for speedy deletion; the relevant criterion is:

No context. Very short articles with little or no context for their statements.

You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

If you have any questions, please contact an administrator for assistance. Thank you J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 18:30, 28 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

February 2008[edit]

The recent edit you made to Swamp Thing (film) constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks. Tiddly-Tom 18:37, 28 February 2008 (UTC))[reply]

AfD nomination of Amina Synge (comics)[edit]

I have nominated Amina Synge (comics), an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amina Synge (comics). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 16:25, 1 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, don't be discouraged about Amina Synge - that one was previously deleted twice, so no surprise that it should come under fire one more time. Your other contributions are still intact! We have other articles (Melter, Ringer (comics), Ego the Living Planet, and others) that have been nominated for deletion. If you feel you can make contributions to the article to improve it and make it worth keeping, please do so. BOZ (talk) 15:59, 7 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

March 2008[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Swamp Thing (film), did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Swamp Thing (film) was changed by Mr. Oobergoober (u) (t) making a minor change adding "!!!" on 2008-03-06T17:58:49+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 17:59, 6 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome[edit]

Hello, Mr. Oobergoober! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already loving Wikipedia you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Happy editing! BigDunc (talk) 12:51, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
Wikipedia Tutorial • The five pillars of Wikipedia How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Frequently Asked Questions Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Things to do
Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Pages needing attention • Peer review Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Speedy deletion of Aegis (Lady of All Sorrows)[edit]

A tag has been placed on Aegis (Lady of All Sorrows) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ukexpat (talk) 23:08, 12 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Amanda (comics)[edit]

An editor has nominated Amanda (comics), an article which you have created or worked on, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amanda (comics) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 02:00, 4 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

April 2008[edit]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Green Arrow, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --GentlemanGhost (talk) 19:26, 6 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have removed your additions to Bob Dylan. The article on Dylan is very long already, and a student poem about Dylan is just not important enough to include in the article. Also, the poem is presumably copyrighted material, and as such cannot be included in its entirety. Brianyoumans (talk) 04:19, 23 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the contributions[edit]

I know that my last message to you was negative, but I see that you've also made a lot of positive contributions to Wikipedia. Specifically, you've created a lot of new comics-related articles. Thanks for doing that! If you're interested, there's a project dedicated to improving Wikipedia's comic book coverage. --GentlemanGhost (talk) 21:36, 2 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:49, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Carrie Alexander listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Carrie Alexander. Since you had some involvement with the Carrie Alexander redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. PRehse (talk) 06:33, 23 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]