User talk:Mr. Wikipediania/Archive 2

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Warning Please do not modify/edit any of these records. If you wish to revive an old discussion that was archived, bring it up on my talk page so that we can discuss it again.
Archive 1 Archive 2


Your signature again

Resolved — Concerns have been acknowledged by Mr. Stradivarius.
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it.

Hello again Mr. Wikipediania! It's Mr. Stradivarius again. I noticed that you changed your user page, but not your sig, so I think we might have had a little miscommunication. In the message I sent you last week I was talking about your signature - the text that you produce when you type ~~~~ after your talk page messages. I don't really mind if you copy my user page, but if at all possible, I would like you to choose a different signature. The one you're using now looks exactly like my old signature, and I have made hundreds (thousands?) of talk page comments using it. If you use the same one, it is very easy for people to mix us up - especially if they are newcomers to Wikipedia. So, pretty please, can you change it? :) There are some good suggestions on styles to use at WP:CUSTOMSIG and Wikipedia:Smurrayinchester's signature tutorial. Also, let me know if you need any personal advice on making sigs - I'll be happy to help. Best — Mr. Stradivarius on tour (have a chat) 03:38, 4 June 2012 (UTC)

 Done, Changed my signature. Sorry I haven't had the time lately because I've had the exams at school, and I almost forgot about it :) Anyways, best. Mr.Wikipediania (has • spoken) 03:45, 4 June 2012 (UTC)
Thank you! You probably want to change the "has" link in your new sig, by the way - it's pointing to User:Strange Passerby's contributions and not yours. And again, let me know if you need any sig help. — Mr. Stradivarius on tour (have a chat) 07:12, 4 June 2012 (UTC)
Again,  Done. Mr.Wikipediania (I have • spoken.) 13:35, 5 June 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 04 June 2012

Wilko Johnson

Resolved — Concerns have been acknowledged. Moving on... Mr.Wikipediania (I have • spoken.) 13:49, 5 June 2012 (UTC)
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it.

I have reverted your ridiculous blanking of all my well-cited edits to the Wilko Johnson page. I have taken out the bit that might be contentious (he has admitted to having used drugs in an interview, but I have taken that out as a BLP precaution). For heaven's sake - when you want to revert something, don't throw the baby out with the bathwater: take out the bit you object to, not everything. You removed many well-cited bits of information. 86.134.91.155 (talk) 13:30, 5 June 2012 (UTC)

Apologies for the revert. I'll be careful next time. But I would like to remind you that naming my edits as "ridiculous" sounds rather rude and that language is far from appropriate here. Mr.Wikipediania (I have • spoken.) 13:32, 5 June 2012 (UTC)
Just so you know, you might want to create an account since you have a profound interest in that person itself. Mr.Wikipediania (I have • spoken.) 13:38, 5 June 2012 (UTC)
I call a spade a spade. You reverted 6,500+ bytes of information - I had almost doubled the size of the article since I started editing it yesterday - apparently without bothering to read any of it - otherwise you would have seen that all the information was well cited and therefore deserved to stay. Even the drugs reference can stay as Johnson has admitted to drug use in an interview (although I have since removed it to avoid a repetiton of this). The drug reference presumably is the contentious bit you objected to. You should have removed just that, if that was what you objected to - a grand total of 33 bytes of information. Instead you wiped out a massive swathe of text. I called your revert ridiculous, because it clearly was. And I'm happy with IP editing, thank-you.86.134.91.155 (talk) 13:44, 5 June 2012 (UTC)
Alright, If you wish to edit by IP's, it's your call. Now, let's put this matter to bed and move on now. And again, I am sorry for the revert. Mr.Wikipediania (I have • spoken.) 13:46, 5 June 2012 (UTC)


Speedy deletion declined: Bhitha

Hello Mr. Wikipediania. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Bhitha, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: There is sufficient context to identify the subject of the article. Thank you. Nikkimaria (talk) 03:23, 6 June 2012 (UTC)

Assistance Required

{{adminhelp}} Hello, I would like to raise an issue with this user here :([1]). It appears that the user is still focusing on their user page, and is making almost no edits to article space, Despite my telling, and he/she is rejecting input, which I believe as a clear breach of WP:DISRUPTIVE. Mr.Wikipediania (Stalk • Talk) 00:43, 11 June 2012 (UTC)

CVUA

 Hello, Mr. Wikipediania! I have seen your hard work reverting vandalism, and I would like to thank you. But do you want to go to the next level? Would you like to know how reverts, warnings, reports, blocks, and bans all come together to keep this Encyclopedia free from disruption? Then consider enrolling today! Leave a message on my talk page or visit the Academy's information page. ~~~~

Electriccatfish2 (talk) 01:11, 11 June 2012 (UTC)

Welcome to the CVUA!

Hi there! I saw your request for an instructor in the WP:CVUA, and I'd love to help you out. If this is okay with you, let me know, and we can start class! :) Theopolisme TALK 03:50, 11 June 2012 (UTC)


Time for Wikipedia has now been carved down for me.

Well, Because of my real-time commitments and other things in my life, I will not be on Wikipedia for some time. I may come and pop in when necessary. Mr.Wikipediania (Stalk • Talk) 07:27, 11 June 2012 (UTC)

CVUA

Hey, great! Glad to start teaching you. To start things off, it'd be great if you took a look at WP:VAND, WP:WARN and WP:GAIV, and let me know if you have any questions. I'll be glad to answer them! Right now, our goal is to get you 100% familiar with "The Big Four Steps", that is Identify, Restore, Warn, Report... but ah, there is so much to do. :D Just become familiar with those articles, and then we can get started with the cool stuff. I see that you've got a lot going on, so I'll try slightly abbreviate/consolidate things to help you graduate ASAP! Theopolisme TALK 16:11, 11 June 2012 (UTC)

POKE! :D
Are you sure that now is a good time for your CVUA instruction? It seems like you're not going to available much, and I can always push it back. Or... ah, let me know. :) Theopolisme TALK 04:26, 13 June 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 11 June 2012

Hi

I would welcome any suggestions of improvement on the talk page. Ankh.Morpork 14:04, 14 June 2012 (UTC)


The Signpost: 18 June 2012

The Signpost: 25 June 2012

Retirement

See Wikipedia:Retiring, and then take a look here. While I know you aren't one, others might get the wrong idea.. Cheers, Theopolisme TALK 16:30, 29 June 2012 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Mr._Wikipediania/Archive_2&oldid=1143179887"