User talk:MrUnoDosTres

Welcome!

Hello, MrUnoDosTres, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome!--Biografer (talk) 20:02, 16 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Love your work on women boxers[edit]

I really like your work on updating the fight records of professional women boxers. I think that there are plently of other professional female women fighters that need work such as Kisha Snow, hit me up if they are others that you didn't know need updating. Dwanyewest (talk) 15:45, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Dwanyewest Hi, thanks for your response. Yeah, I noticed as well that a lot of professional female fighters were missing their fight records. I stumbled upon a couple myself, some only have their last few fights on their page, and some miss their entire boxing record. If there are more you would like to suggest, feel free to let me know. MrUnoDosTres (talk) 16:39, 28 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User:MrUnoDosTres there so many I don't know where to begin here are a few examples of fighters with missing fight records Cecilia Comunales, Louisa Hawton, Juliette Winter, Noriko Kariya, Conjestina Achieng, Natascha Ragosina, Jessica Balogun, Hülya Şahin, Alesia Graf, Daisy Ocasio, Brenda Burnside, Elena Reid, Catherine Phiri, Daisy Lang,Ria Ramnarine and these are the ones I am aware of don't hesitate to contact me if you need a list of other ones. Dwanyewest (talk) 11:49, 29 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Here are a few more Chantal Martínez,Mónica Núñez,Pamela London, Shondell Alfred, Johanna Peña Álvarez, Irma Sánchez, Arely Muciño, Ana María Torres, Lena Åkesson, Åsa Sandell, Ijeoma Egbunine, Kisha Snow, Teresa Perozzi,Momo Koseki,Cathy Brown (boxer),Christina Hammer,Tori Nelson, Marian “Tyger” Trimiar, Jackie Tonawanda, Cathy Davis. Dwanyewest (talk) 12:41, 29 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Metro City[edit]

Hey MrUnoDosTres. I don't know if you are creating "Metro City nightclub" in your sandbox but disambiguation pages should only hold blue links (Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Disambiguation pages). Would you mind waiting until the page is published before linking? HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 02:31, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi HickoryOughtShirt?4, and thanks for your response. I was about to ask why you had reverted my contribution. Thanks for the explanation. No, I am not creating the "Metro City nightclub" page. I am actually working on Louisa Hawton's professional boxing record. One of her fights was at the Metro City nightclub. And Metro City was redirecting to that disambiguation page. That is why I had added the nightclub. I will remove the internal link then. So, people don't get confused. MrUnoDosTres (talk) 02:41, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, that makes sense. I was looking at the pages you created and contributed to and a nightclub seemed out of the ordinary. Anyways, thanks for understanding and have a happy New Years!

HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 02:46, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Happy New Years to you as well! MrUnoDosTres (talk) 02:58, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 30[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Cecilia Comunales, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Estadio Municipal (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:10, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Eva Wahlström / flagicons[edit]

Greetings! Based on our interaction at Eva Wahlström, and your ongoing work on women's boxing articles, I would like to invite you to start a new discussion at the Project regarding the use/inclusion of flagicons. At the Project we last had an RfC which ended in January 2016, with the result being a WP:NOCONSENSUS. Therefore, when interpreting that, it meant that articles which had flagicons in a stable revision would retain them, but articles without them in a stable revision would not have them inserted at all.

It was the best compromise we could come up with at the time, but three years have gone by and the problems that flagicons present (regardless of which side of the argument editors happen to be on) are still an issue. I've been musing over restarting the discussion for a while, but the main thing holding me back has been a lack of participation by other editors (again, on both sides; I don't care who "wins"). If you're up for it as well, I would be happy to get back into it and perhaps change the prevailing no-consensus into something more definitive. Mac Dreamstate (talk) 18:49, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Mac Dreamstate, I would be interested in restarting that discussion. But I guess that it would have to wait a little due to New Year's Eve. My issue with the Wikipedia page of Eva Wahlström specifically is that you were the first one to delete the flags by calling them "useless eye candy". And you seem to be the only one who keeps deleting them. Even though a couple of other users before me also attempted to add flags.

I personally respect whether flags should or shouldn't be added with someone's professional record if it is common practice to use/not use them. For example with MMA records they don't use them. For example:

But all these boxers have flags:

And even here flags were used:

Conor McGregor's professional boxing record

And this list could go on for quite a while like this. So, not using them, because I happen to personally dislike flags isn't in my opinion a good argument.

I personally respect the nationality provided by BoxRec. So, I don't add flags, because I "feel" that a boxer has for example a Mexican heritage, if BoxRec says that the boxer's nationality is American. In such a case I will only use the American flag.

The RfC specifically states, I quote, "There is no consensus. The responces are thought out, but are to evenly split. One opinion is that they provide easy identification of the nationality of boxers. The other that flags are a magnet to disagreement and that words are better than flags. Being a no consensus close WP:NOCONSENSUS should apply and appropriate guidelines should be followed."

So that is exactly what I do. I follow the guidelines of MOS:SPORTFLAGS which specifies that only the representative nationality should be used, which I do. MrUnoDosTres (talk) 04:23, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Can I ask a favour please?[edit]

Could you redirect Indian Bull Terrier to Gull Terrier as I don't know how to do it. Dwanyewest (talk) 15:22, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Dwanyewest, sorry for my late response. I can make a redirect if you want. My only question is, are you 100% sure that these are the same dogs. Because I googled it a bit. But people on some forums were claiming that the Indian Bull Terrier and the Gull Terrier aren't the same dog.

"My male is 16 inches and female is 17 inches at withers, Hinks dogs range is also same, why do you think they are bigger ? I suppose you are confusing gull terr with Indian bull terrier, gull terr are heighted than Indian bull terrier. Google difference between gull terr and Ibt you would come to know what i am trying to say." Source: Pit Bull Chat

"Secondly i am not talking about gull terrs of Pakistan i again repeat this, this are Indian bull terriers different than pak versions. gull terr are mix between bully and Ibt, they are larger than Ibt in size." Source: Staffy Bull Terrier

Unfortunately I couldn't find any official sources. Only these comments on forums. MrUnoDosTres (talk) 16:03, 4 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 23[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of ethnic cleansing campaigns, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bloody Christmas (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 23 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Estadio Municipal de Pando moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Estadio Municipal de Pando, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 13:22, 23 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 29[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of number-one songs of the 2010s (Turkey), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sıla (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 14:52, 29 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Estadio Municipal de Pando concern[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Estadio Municipal de Pando, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 00:44, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Estadio Municipal de Pando[edit]

Hello, MrUnoDosTres. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Estadio Municipal de Pando".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 06:23, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:18, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:46, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:47, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:25, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:45, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]