User talk:Mramoeba/Archive 3
 | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Hello Mramoeba, a few days ago you reverted my changes on the title article, citing the reasons being that a) I was "refbombing with articles about 'unconfirmed sources' which don't support the information added", and b) using the names of minors. Now while the latter reason is very valid and I should be more sensitive and sensible about it, the former point is definitely not true, the references actually had interviews with the father of one of the victims believed to have committed suicide as a result of the game, the Algerian minister of communication discussing the game, news reports detailing the location, time, names of victims, and more details, all reported by known news outlets, and I've used the words "claim" and "allegedly" at every chance. Now I am just as skeptical as the next guy about this Blue Whale game frenzy which is most probably a moral panic, but I'd like to think that I followed best practice to include reported cases in Algeria. What's frustrating is that I had to convince another member of the Wikipedia community not to take down my contribution, and followed his/her instructions to make sure my contribution is up to the standards of Wikipedia. Could you please either educate me on how I can make my contributions more durable, or allow me to add the same part again after removing the minor name? --Modi mode (talk) 12:52, 23 December 2017 (UTC)
- Firstly the first sentence about the boy is entirely speculative, parents in distress are not reliable sources for Blue Whale. This should not be on the page at all. Besides which the BBC reference you cited did not appear to mention this case. The next sentence “many other reports of claimed attempted suicides linked to the game” is also deeply problematic. It is basically reliant on clickbait citations which use terminology like “other sources told Al-Arabiya.net that...”, and “According to informed sources...” it just isn’t good enough for an encyclopaedia. Does it sound encyclopaedic, does it add anything solid and informative to the page? No. Refbombing refers to the insertion of no less than 3 poorly formatted citations (take a look at the reflist for the version in question. I would suggest if you find articles which confirm beyond any doubt the influence of Blue Whale and they add informed content to the page, and is not a newspaper article about a death or attempted suicide, then it may be worth adding, but adding another country and another distraught parent’s comments in a newpaper is not adding anything but fuel to the fire. Thank you for your question and I bet you have some great content to add to other maybe more factual pages in the mean time. Mramoeba (talk) 17:58, 24 December 2017 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
|
The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar |
| Thank you for being nice, rational and a reasonable editor on WP. Life is too short to deal with trolling! Jooojay (talk) 02:42, 4 January 2018 (UTC) |
Women in Red
Hi there, Mramoeba! I'm glad to see you've become a member of Women in Red. If you need help or run into any problems, please let me know or post a message on the WiR talk page. Happy editing.--Ipigott (talk) 15:53, 16 February 2018 (UTC)
Women's History Month 2018 at Women in Red
  
| ||
|
(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) --Rosiestep (talk) 16:09, 20 February 2018 (UTC) via MassMessaging |
You've got mail!
Message added 19:16, 26 February 2018 (UTC). It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.
--Cameron11598 (Talk) 19:16, 26 February 2018 (UTC)
- Hello I'm still waiting on a response to the email. Without a response I can not continue to process your request for an account through Newspapers.com Thanks! --Cameron11598 (Talk) 19:36, 28 February 2018 (UTC)
A page you started (Robert Bartholomew (sociologist)) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Robert Bartholomew (sociologist), Mramoeba!
Wikipedia editor Cwmhiraeth just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
A well-written article and a useful addition to Wikipedia. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:45, 13 March 2018 (UTC)
To reply, leave a comment on Cwmhiraeth's talk page.
Learn more about page curation.
Canada
Have a look at this link to the Canadian Biennale (which strangely includes a lot of foreign artists)... but has a fairly complement of female artists. And Janet Cardiff. And Althea Thauberger headlining the Canadian Art web site. And this ROM show where more than half the artists are women. I'm not saying we are perfect, but please don't confuse American problems with Canadian problems. 104.163.147.121 (talk) 04:06, 15 March 2018 (UTC)
- The source I linked wasn’t solely the USA. Here is a different analysis of Canada where the same problem exists. All of this is tangential, it is a worldwide phenomenon. We are all presumably on the same side with the same aims, creating and maintaining good informative pages. No one doubts the existance of successful female Canadian artists, what @Freshacconci: and I were referencing is the particular difficulties faced in sourcing press and eliminating gender imbalance on Wikipedia, which is also a thing. Mramoeba (talk) 16:52, 15 March 2018 (UTC)
Service award progress
68.6% completed
April 2018 at Women in Red
| ||
|
To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list or
Women in Red/international list. To unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list. Follow us on Twitter: |
DYK for Robert Bartholomew (sociologist)
On 1 April 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Robert Bartholomew (sociologist), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Robert Bartholomew has been in hysterics for over twenty years? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Robert Bartholomew (sociologist). You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Robert Bartholomew (sociologist)), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Alex Shih (talk) 00:01, 1 April 2018 (UTC)
Incomplete DYK nomination
Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/Patricia Lovett at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; if you would like to continue, please link the nomination to the nominations page as described in step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with {{db-g7}}, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 15:41, 14 April 2018 (UTC)
DYK for Patricia Lovett
On 23 April 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Patricia Lovett, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Patricia Lovett created a medieval-style book of hours (pictured) for the BBC production of Wolf Hall? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Patricia Lovett. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Patricia Lovett), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Gatoclass (talk) 12:02, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
May 2018 at Women in Red
  
| ||
|
(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) --Rosiestep (talk) 23:11, 29 April 2018 (UTC) via MassMessaging |
Wiki Loves Food
Hello! After the successful pilot program by Wikimedia India in 2015, Wiki Loves Food (WLF) is happening again in 2018 and this year, it's going International. To make this event a grand success, your direction is key. Please sign up here as a volunteer to bring all the world's food to Wikimedia. Danidamiobi (talk) 21:07, 6 May 2018 (UTC)
A page you started (Aliyah Saleem) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Aliyah Saleem, Mramoeba!
Wikipedia editor Cwmhiraeth just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
An interesting article and a useful addition to Wikipedia.
To reply, leave a comment on Cwmhiraeth's talk page.
Learn more about page curation.
Cwmhiraeth (talk) 08:55, 23 May 2018 (UTC)
Women in Red June Editathons
| ||
|
(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) |
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 17:15, 29 May 2018 (UTC) via MassMessaging
.jpeg){kind=link}
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:19, 3 June 2018 (UTC)
Merger discussion for Assisted Death in the United States
An article that you have been involved in editing—Assisted Death in the United States—has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. 8==8 Boneso (talk) 08:39, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
Invitation to participate in study
Hello,
I am E. Whittaker, an intern at Wikimedia with the Scoring Team to create a labeled dataset, and potentially a tool, to help editors deal with incivility when they encounter it on talk pages. A full write-up of the study can be found here: m:Research:Civil_Behavior_Interviews. We are currently recruiting editors to be interviewed about their experiences with incivility on talk pages. Would you be interested in being interviewed? I am contacting you because of your involvement in Wikipedia’s Women in Red project. The interviews should take ~1 hour, and will be conducted over BlueJeans (which does allow interviews to be recorded). If, so, please email me at ewhit@umich.edu in order to schedule an interview.
Thank you Ewitch51 (talk) 21:35, 18 June 2018 (UTC)
July 2018 at Women in Red
| ||
|
(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) --Rosiestep (talk) 14:04, 28 June 2018 (UTC) via MassMessaging |