User talk:Mrkrannawitter
Please do not add commercial links — or links to your own private websites — to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or a mere collection of external links. See the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. (ESkog)(Talk) 08:27, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
Look at the rest of the external links on the various pages you are adding to. All of them are civic sites, run by cities and school districts. This site is run by a corporation and it is designed to advertise certain upscale KC-area restaurants. Saying "not commercial" in the edit summary does not make it not commercial. I'm removing the links again. (ESkog)(Talk) 17:59, 21 January 2006 (UTC)
- Just so you know, I agree with ESkog's deletion of the links you're adding. I checked one of them out this morning and found it to defintiely be commercialized. If you want to list a guide of Kansas City restaurants, make sure such a list has every restaurant in the metro. And I mean EVERY. --KHill-LTown 23:10, 21 January 2006 (UTC)
Also, in case I forget to mention it, thanks for being civil with this whole thing. It's easy for these conversations to turn nasty in a hurry and I appreciate the exceptions to the rule. (ESkog)(Talk) 07:38, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
Thank you as well
[edit]Not actually living in Kansas City, I don't know everything about the town. I don't know all the areas and all the restaurants. I appreciate the comments I have recieved to better understand how KC and Wiki all work. I have just had such a good time at restaurants I found with the *Restaurant Guide I thought others traveling or moving to KC might like to know.
I thank you as well for being civil. I have not been editing the wiki long, but i have used it for research for years and have often wondered if people were friendly when working out differences. I hope most users are a curteous and friendly as you have been. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Mrkrannawitter (talk • contribs) 07:47, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
- Another note - you can sign your posts on Talk pages by adding ~~~~. (ESkog)(Talk) 08:12, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
Image copyright problem with Image:Mike ONeal.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading Image:Mike ONeal.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).
The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}
.
Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me, or ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. 82.83.109.179 17:55, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
File permission problem with File:Mike Oneal.jpg
[edit]![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/c/cf/Copyright-problem.svg/64px-Copyright-problem.svg.png)
Thanks for uploading File:Mike Oneal.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.
If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
- make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
- Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.
If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.
If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 15:55, 18 May 2016 (UTC)