User talk:MsOrange1

Urswick School

Wrong - It is YOUR job to make sure that anything you add to this article is not a copyright violation - it is not enough for you to cite references to the website, it must be completely re-written or its plagiarism - Are you aware that this article was already deleted once because of plagiarism? Bleaney (talk) 11:48, 11 July 2015 (UTC)

So perhaps this is where the confusion lies- how can I plagiarise myself? Those are my words on my website so where does the plagiarism lie? Can you tell me exactly where the plagiarism is, is it the direct quotes? As I have seen them used on other pages.

Because even if you did write it (and where is the proof?) The material is now on the school website and therefore the school own it (I do not see any name attributed to the content on the website itself by the way) and the school have not given us permission to use their content word for word. Besides, this is Wikipedia... it is an encyclopedia, not a promotional tool for the school, most of the content you are adding is way too detailed or even irrelevant for an encyclopedia. Bleaney (talk) 18:49, 13 July 2015 (UTC)

It went up on the school site after I uploaded it to Wikipedia. Once again, as long as its factual I don't understand why I have to factor in your subjective view on what is relevant- it is relevant information to someone wanting more information about the school.

I don't believe you about writing the stuff on Wikipedia before it was on the official school website. I have grown tired of reverting your copyrighted material and the irrelevant stuff - it is way to biased its sooo promotional and not balanced at all. If you add the material again I will have no choice but to seek to either get the article protected from you editing it or blocking you for not following Wikipedia policy. Bleaney (talk) 18:11, 20 July 2015 (UTC)