User talk:Msiev

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions.

Currently, you are editing without a username. You can continue to do so, as you are not required to log in to Wikipedia to read and edit articles; however, logging in will result in a username being shown instead of your IP address (yours is Msiev). Logging in does not require any personal details. There are many other benefits for logging in to Wikipedia. For now, if you are stuck, you can type {{helpme}} on this page and an experienced Wikipedian will be around to answer any questions you may have.

Please note these points:

Please respect others' copyrights; do not copy and paste the contents from webpages directly.
Please use a neutral point of view when editing articles; this is possibly the most important Wikipedia policy.
If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so.

The Wikipedia Tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, ask me on my Talk page. I will answer your questions as far as I can! Thank you again for contributing to Wikipedia. ≈ jossi ≈ t • @ 14:00, 24 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hindu books?

Do you mean change the cat name? I think it could be changed to Hindu history books.--Dangerous-Boy 18:09, 26 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ram JAnmabhoomi

First, thanks Msiev for handling this democratically and not blatantly removing the templates.

Secondly, thanks for helping out with the referncing...much appreciated.

Inscriptions..... Is "Purattatva" a book by Ajay Mitra Shastri? And YES an internet source is essential. It would be easy for anyone (read pro-Muslims) to quote a random/make-believe book written by a make believe author. An article like this must have "accessible" information, ie accessible to all.
Findings...Here you are correct. It must be referenced, as you said. It also needs to be concised and a lengthier version put on another page.
Literary sources.... I believe this section to be obscenely pro Hindu. Also it contains sources from a single literary source, viz H Narain. Again it would be wise to concise this section, add Internet references and add other literary sources (of varied and concise opinion). I do believe that the title of the section is also wrong (although I named it so). An encyclopedia must give state its facts and these must be referncesd. Hwo this section can be aptly changed or reworked is confusing though (and not of prime importance)
Split into 2003 ASI Report... This is essential. After all this page is about Lord Rama's Birthplace. Why must something of such great religious significance have more refernces to destruction and devastation leaves me in confusion. Also the article is long (55 kb) and the details of the ASI report take up much of this space. It is not easy reading by any means. It would be viable to reduce all sections on the report and link a main article. I agree that 'Archaeology in Ayodhya' or 'Archaeology of the Babri Masjid/ Ram Janmabhoomi site' are better names. They would be suitable as well. Redirect pages would be needed as well.
Split into Harsh Narain's book article ....I believe we can directly link this to his page and create a separate section there (albeit a lengthier one)

Eggman64 10:14, 2 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Carnegy

You'll need to rework all the links in the harsh narain section. Frankly I believe its too long and should be summaried. Sorry, you were right with the citing sources. I apoligise.Eggman64 15:48, 2 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Babri_Mosque

I reverted vandalism. The bot has undid the changes. UP has population of 31m not 13m. Anwar 14:23, 8 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi - I'm sorry that I or others can't be of immediate help. Please keep your cool despite any provocation, and always bear in mind WP policies such as WP:3RR. Conflicts come and go, and the Babri is an inherent magnet for problem editors. This Fire Burns.....Always 06:12, 11 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:K. S. Lal

Template:K. S. Lal has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Walrus Ji (talk) 20:44, 19 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]