User talk:Msnaughty

Welcome!

Hello, Msnaughty, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} after the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! Funpika 00:00, 9 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

April 2022[edit]

Hello, I'm Bruce1ee. I wanted to let you know that one or more external links you added to Cake and Cunnilingus Day have been removed because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links. Thank you. —Bruce1ee ^talk 07:19, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

So I've looked at the guidelines around links. I can't find any reference to what is "inappropriate". Would you like to clarify what you mean by that?

Considering the article in question mentions me, my blog post and then quotes the blog post, I would have considered it reasonable to actually add a footnote to reference the blog post which is being discussed. How is this not relevant?

I have now also been banned for "self promotion". I had no idea that this article existed or mentioned me until yesterday. I did not write it. I haven't edited anything on Wikipedia for years. But I felt that it was quote rude that this article should reference AND QUOTE something I'd written without bothering to include a reference in the footnotes. Does Wikipedia typically quote authors without including a reference to their work? Msnaughty (talk) 00:15, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for advertising or promotion.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Doug Weller talk 10:52, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Msnaughty (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have worked with women's porn and feminist pornography since 2001. I have published work on this topic including a chapter in The Feminist Porn Book and won awards for my films. I wrote the first ever Wikipedia article on the history of women's erotica. But haven't edited anything on Wikipedia for years because I have nothing to add and apparently it is seen as self promotion. So I don't do it. In yesterday's case, I had no idea that the article (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cake_and_Cunnilingus_Day) existed or that it mentioned me until yesterday. I did not write it. But I felt that it was quote rude that this article should reference AND QUOTE something I'd written without bothering to include a reference to it in the footnotes. As far as I'm aware, Wikipedia references authors when their work is quoted. This is why I made the edit. Thus, I'm appealing this ban. Have a good day. Msnaughty (talk) 00:32, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You are blocked, not banned(there is a difference). This does not demonstrate an understanding of why it was inappropriate to add links to your blog or an understanding of how to edit with a confict of interest. 331dot (talk) 08:06, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

No, you did not write the first ever article on the history of women's erotica. It was written by User:Empowerment2007 in January 2007, you edited it in April of that year using yourself as a source. About a year later you promoted yourself in the article again.[1] In Dec.2012 you promoted yourself on another article.[2] using an article on feministpornguide.com that you wrote. Doug Weller talk 15:14, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]