User talk:Mswygart/"critical information literacy"

Linking from other pages[edit]

Don't remember us discussing this in the Twitter chat, but it seems advisable to eventually link to our page from the main "Information Literacy" page because of the "no isolated pages" guideline, right? Foureyedsoul (talk) 05:27, 21 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yes! - Lawsonstu (talk) 06:59, 21 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I think not only is it advisable, but I'd even suggest placing a paragraph on critical information literacy in the larger infolit article (maybe in the Information Literacy Models section?) with a link to our new page to learn more. --CarlSHess (talk) 14:28, 21 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yes - definitely! Also definite yes to Carl's idea of adding a paragraph to the main "info lit" article on crit info lit and then linking to our article.Mswygart (talk) 21:56, 21 May 2014 (UTC)Mswygart[reply]

Article structure[edit]

What sections should our article have? Here are some I remember from last night: Definition, Background/History, Intersectionality, #critlib (though I worry this will fall under Wikipedia's no self-promotion bit), Library Juice Press, Critical Information Literacy in US, Critical Information Literacy Outside US. I think a section on critiques of standard models and definitions of information literacy would be great.--CarlSHess (talk) 15:00, 21 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe also a "Praxis" section - referencing publications/sources illustrating Crit Info Lit in practice/explicit library instruction examples?Mswygart (talk) 21:59, 21 May 2014 (UTC)Mswygart[reply]