User talk:Mushroom/Archive 21
 | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
barnstar
|
The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar | |
| Since those who contribute without logging in are not always welcomed, here's a token of appreciation for your "welcome" message. 68.165.77.110 (talk) 23:40, 29 January 2010 (UTC) |
Wintersun barnstar
Thank you so much for the recognition, Mushroom. It's sincerely appreciated! – Kerαunoςcopia◁galaxies 04:25, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
iPad pricing section
Hey
If you're interested this is being discussed on the iPad talk page as it seems to have been added and removed several times? Thanks. -- Eraserhead1 <talk> 17:20, 20 February 2010 (UTC)
Thank you for the welcome
Thanks for the kind welcome Mushroom. I have some trepidation posting this here - is editing a user page to say 'thanks' acceptable? I have no idea!
Anyway, thanks again. I am an expert only in feral cats, frugal living, and some other non encyclopedic areas. I pretty much confine myself to making edits on punctuation, spelling, and grammar.
Cheers. —Preceding unsigned comment added by TheAsocialApe (talk • contribs) 01:38, 21 February 2010 (UTC)
- You're a WikiGnome then! :) You can write what you want on a user talk page, unlike article talk pages which should be limited to discussions about article content. If you have any other doubts or need any help feel free to ask. Cheers. Mushroom (Talk) 01:56, 21 February 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for the welcome to wikipedia. However, I should tell you that that was the anonymous banner that I edited under for the Universal (Borknagar album) page when I got accidentally logged off for some reason that is beyond my comprehension. Stuff like that where I have accidentally logged off without knowingly pressing the log out button has happened at least three other times during my time on wikipedia. I just thought I would tell you that; thanks. Backtable Speak to meconcerning my deeds. 00:40, 26 February 2010 (UTC)
Could you please help me with adding a picture and the image policy stuff
First of all, thanks for your warm welcome. I've now created a wholly new article and have some problems with adding an image there. I've tried to search the answers and guidance on the help page but partly cause I'm a newbie here and my English is so rusty I've not understood everything. So could you help me please? More information on my own talk page.Harsi62 (talk) 10:13, 17 March 2010 (UTC)
WikiProject Macintosh Revival
Hello, Mushroom! You've listed yourself as an active member of WikiProject Macintosh, which is currently seeing very little activity. We are trying to revive the project and your help would be appreciated. To see who is active and who is not, we will be listing all active members under "status pending" in the project's participant list. Please move your name to either the "former members" section or "active" section. Hope to see you in the "active" column! For more information on how to help the project, visit the How to help section at our project page! · EdwardsBot (talk) 02:34, 26 April 2010 (UTC)
WikiProject Macintosh Role Call
Hello, Mushroom! You've listed yourself as an active member of WikiProject Macintosh, which is currently being revived. Your help would be appreciated! To see who is active and who is not, we will be listing all active members under "status pending" in the project's participant list. Please move your name to either the "former members" section or "active" section. The role call will end May 31; please move your name now if you are still interested. For more information on how to help the project, visit the How to help section at our project page! · MonoBot04:18, 2 May 2010 (UTC)
Articles for deletion nomination of Apple.com
I have nominated Apple.com, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Apple.com. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. —fetch·comms 02:39, 25 May 2010 (UTC)
The article Soundholic has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Non notable record company - fails WP:CORP ONLY claim to any form of notability is one of WP:INHERITANCE through bands.
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Codf1977 (talk) 12:36, 27 June 2010 (UTC)
Articles for deletion nomination of Soundholic
I have nominated Soundholic, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Soundholic. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Codf1977 (talk) 18:26, 4 July 2010 (UTC)
Nomination of ITablet for deletion
A discussion has begun about whether the article ITablet, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ITablet until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.
You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. -- Eraserhead1 <talk> 21:37, 18 September 2010 (UTC)
Hi man, yo man, hi man, YO MAN!!!???
So, I am new and I was wondering what I should create, have any suggestions? PIandPIECenter (talk) 23:04, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for File:Meshuggah-Nothing-2.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Meshuggah-Nothing-2.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — ξxplicit 18:53, 2 November 2010 (UTC)
Dealing with IP Address editors
I am working on the Alternate versions of Spider-Man, trying to take out some false and misleading information that a fandom keeps putting back in. User:67.250.61.174 keeps reverting my edits, leaving no message on the edit log, his discussion page, my discussion page, or the article's talk page. What would be the next appropriate step to take to ensure that my work just doesn't get reverted again? Notthegoatseguy (talk) 01:58, 8 December 2010 (UTC)
Christmas Card
Seeking Hiren's.BootCD Information.
I've been looking for information about "Hiren's.BootCD" and I see it's been taken down. Is there a reason this CD is not allowed in Wikipedia? I'm interested in using this CD for diagnostic purposes but wanted to see what Wikipedia had to say about it. Jimbellofbelmont Jimbellofbelmont (talk) 01:14, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
The WITF wants you
— Preceding unsigned comment added by SunCountryGuy01 (talk • contribs)
Notification: changes to "Mark my edits as minor by default" preference
Hello there. This is an automated message to tell you about the gradual phasing out of the preference entitled "Mark all edits minor by default", which you currently have (or very recently had) enabled.
On 13 March 2011, this preference was hidden from the user preferences screen as part of efforts to prevent its accidental misuse (consensus discussion, guidelines for use at WP:MINOR). This had the effect of locking users in to their existing preference, which, in your case, was true. To complete the process, your preference will automatically be changed to false in the next few days. This does not require any intervention on your part and all users will still be able to manually mark their edits as being minor in the usual way.
For well-established users such as yourself there is a workaround available involving custom JavaScript. If you have any problems, feel free to drop me a note.
Thank you for your understanding and happy editing :) Editing on behalf of User:Jarry1250, LivingBot (talk) 20:16, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Listenable Records
The article Listenable Records has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Likely even speedy material if it wasn't for the current amount of bands but searches unsurprisingly found nothing but then again this seems like an independent obscure field and area.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. SwisterTwister talk 06:05, 29 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:15, 30 November 2015 (UTC)
Can someone add an Indiana section to Statewide Polling foe the Republican Primaries page. There is a new Indiana poll and no Indiana Section. DOn't feel competent to add such a section. I put the poll on the new polls section of the page
BigEdLB (Edward) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bigedlb (talk • contribs) 20:21, 11 December 2015 (UTC)
Category:Dark Tranquillity has been nominated for discussion
Category:Dark Tranquillity, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 03:24, 5 April 2016 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Behrouz A. Forouzan
The article Behrouz A. Forouzan has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Unsourced biography of a living person. No real claims to notability other than authoring textbooks.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. H.dryad (talk) 12:43, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Bay Area Rock Fest
The article Bay Area Rock Fest has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- I'm not seeing the required sourcing necessary to meet WP:NEVENTS
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -- Tavix (talk) 22:29, 14 August 2016 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protection
Hello, Mushroom. This message is intended to notify administrators of important changes to the protection policy.
Extended confirmed protection (also known as "30/500 protection") is a new level of page protection that only allows edits from accounts at least 30 days old and with 500 edits. The automatically assigned "extended confirmed" user right was created for this purpose. The protection level was created following this community discussion with the primary intention of enforcing various arbitration remedies that prohibited editors under the "30 days/500 edits" threshold to edit certain topic areas.
In July and August 2016, a request for comment established consensus for community use of the new protection level. Administrators are authorized to apply extended confirmed protection to combat any form of disruption (e.g. vandalism, sock puppetry, edit warring, etc.) on any topic, subject to the following conditions:
- Extended confirmed protection may only be used in cases where semi-protection has proven ineffective. It should not be used as a first resort.
- A bot will post a notification at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard of each use. MusikBot currently does this by updating a report, which is transcluded onto the noticeboard.
Please review the protection policy carefully before using this new level of protection on pages. Thank you.
This message was sent to the administrators' mass message list. To opt-out of future messages, please remove yourself from the list. 17:48, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
December 2017
Thanks for contributing to the article Shigureden. However, one of Wikipedia's core policies is that contributions must be verifiable, by being clearly attributed to reliable sources, preferably using inline citations. Please help by adding more sources to the article you edited, and/or by clarifying how the sources already given support the claims (see here for how to do inline referencing). Thanks! P.S. If you need any help, you can look at Help:Contents/Editing Wikipedia or ask at Wikipedia:New contributors' help page, or just ask me. Thank you. --Jax 0677 (talk) 15:17, 4 December 2017 (UTC)
- @Jax 0677: Thank you, I have added some references to the article. Mushroom (Talk) 12:39, 5 December 2017 (UTC)
- @Jax 0677:, you know Mushroom is an admin, right? I think it's safe to assume that they don't need a template, but a note is always appreciated. Drmies (talk) 15:11, 5 December 2017 (UTC)
Activity level
I have annotated all the major Shakespeare plays in a unique way in that the definitions of difficult words and the explanations of difficult passages appear within the text, in boldfaced type inside brackets. Thus, for the most part, the reader does not need to interrupt his or her perusal of a text by navigating to a footnote, then back to the text. Each text appears on one page. However, to assure fast loading of a page—and to make it appealing to a user—I have omitted ads and images. My site has received favorable reviews from The New York Times, the BBC, the British Library, and teacher sites. Wikipedia, on the other hand, has deleted links that I have posted even though Wikipedia editors accept links to Shakespeare sites that contain ads and cannot match the scholarship on my pages. If you doubt what I say, check out the following links to Shakespeare plays.
http://shakespearestudyguide.com/JuliusCaesarText.html http://shakespearestudyguide.com/CoriolanusText.html http://shakespearestudyguide.com/MuchAdoAbout.html http://www.shakespearestudyguide.com/TwelfthNightGuide.html
May I have permission to post links to my Shakepeare texts without worry that someone will delete them?
Wikipedia is an extraordinary resource for students, teachers, and researchers. I believe my Shakespeare texts can enhance the experience of Wikipedia users researching Shakespeare.
Sincerely, Michael J. Cummings mcum.mings@mail.comZekscrab (talk) 00:31, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
Hey Mushroom, I'm about to write you an email in reference to WP:INACTIVITY but the procedure requires I also leave a note here. So, here's the note... Thanks, Drmies (talk) 17:56, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
Hello, Mushroom. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Notification of pending suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity
Established policy provides for removal of the administrative permissions of users who have not made any edits or logged actions in the preceding twelve months. Because you have been inactive, your administrative permissions will be removed if you do not return to activity within the next month.
Inactive administrators are encouraged to rejoin the project in earnest rather than to make token edits to avoid loss of administrative permissions. Resources and support for reengaging with the project are available at Wikipedia:WikiProject Editor Retention/administrators. If you do not intend to rejoin the project in the foreseeable future, please consider voluntarily resigning your administrative permissions by making a request at the bureaucrats' noticeboard.
Thank you for your past contributions to the project. — JJMC89 bot 00:02, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
1 new message
this talk page is so EMPTY AA
but hello!
BloxyColaSweet (talk) 03:52, 2 November 2021 (UTC)
Greek language userbox
Hey Mushroom,
You've deleted the [Template:User_Grek-1] page before, but I'm reusing it to home the userbox for the Greek language, and this is post is to notify you of that. Thanks, - Frzzl (talk) 17:54, 30 December 2021 (UTC)
Special:WantedTemplates
 | This edit request to User:Mushroom/Advisor.js has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Hi! Would it be possible for you to add
/* <nowiki> */
to the top and
/* </nowiki> */
to the bottom of User:Mushroom/Advisor.js? By putting these tags inside of javascript comments, it won't impact the functionality of your script, but it will keep the backend software from transcluding Template:' + name + ' . You will know if the tags worked if Special:WhatLinksHere/Template:' + name + ' no longer shows your javascript page. By fixing these, we can keep the number of entries in Special:WantedTemplates to a minimum. Thank you in advance for your help! Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:19, 16 April 2022 (UTC)
- Looks like this user is not active, could an interface-editor help? Thanks! Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:58, 7 May 2022 (UTC)
Done — xaosflux Talk 00:34, 8 May 2022 (UTC)
"Wikipedia:Failing Flesh" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Wikipedia:Failing Flesh and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 June 19#Wikipedia:Failing Flesh until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Liz Read! Talk! 13:59, 19 June 2022 (UTC)
Question
Have you ever met any people born in Africa who live in the Italy? If so, which countries were they born in? AmericanEditor350 (talk) 21:10, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
The article Festival de Metal Boricua has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
WP:NCONCERT fails notability music. I found no sources for this.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. The Eloquent Peasant (talk) 19:46, 22 July 2022 (UTC)
The article Tom Diener has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
fails WP:GNG --
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. FMSky (talk) 15:42, 26 July 2022 (UTC)