User talk:MusicHyper

Welcome! (We can't say that loudly enough!)

Hello, MusicHyper, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

If you have any questions or problems, no matter what they are, leave me a message on my talk page. Or, please come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{Help me}} on your user talk page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

Please sign your name on talk pages and votes by typing four tildes (~~~~); our software automatically converts it to your username and the date.

We're so glad you're here! Meatsgains^(talk) 19:29, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Borrtex for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Borrtex is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Borrtex until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Chetsford (talk) 20:35, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not a paid Wikipedia contributor. I represent myself and my own beliefs.

Then perhaps you can explain how you became the copyright holder of these two photos and your connection to the subject. Thanks. Praxidicae (talk) 22:58, 1 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Absolutely, I can confirm that I'm the copyright holder of both of those images. I also do know Borrtex personally and I'm a sincere fan of his work, but he does not compensate me in any type or form. I'm making all my contributions from my own goodwill in order to help others to get free access to these pieces of information. MusicHyper (talk) 23:06, 1 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

February 2020[edit]

Hello MusicHyper. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat SEO.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:MusicHyper. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=MusicHyper|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Praxidicae (talk) 17:22, 1 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not a paid Wikipedia contributor. I represent my own opinions and beliefs. MusicHyper (talk) 22:56, 1 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

you are required by policy to disclose your WP:COI. Thanks. Praxidicae (talk) 01:57, 2 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Already mentioned above. I do know Borrtex personally, BUT I'm not his family member neither a friend. You're welcome. MusicHyper (talk) 09:12, 2 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Borrtex for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Borrtex is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Borrtex (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Praxidicae (talk) 17:52, 1 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

February 2020[edit]

As previously advised, your edits give the impression you have a financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. You were asked to cease editing until you responded by either stating that you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits, or by complying with the mandatory requirements under the Wikimedia Terms of Use that you disclose your employer, client and affiliation. Again, you can post such a disclosure on your user page at User:MusicHyper, and the template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=MusicHyper|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. Please respond before making any other edits to Wikipedia. Since you've clearly read your talk page and responded elsewhere, despite the warning above to not edit until you've responded, here is a second warning. Praxidicae (talk) 22:45, 1 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Already replied. MusicHyper (talk) 22:57, 1 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]