User talk:Mymuffpuff

Warning: no personal attacks[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we would like to remind you not to attack other editors. Please comment on the contributions and not the contributors. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Gimmetrow 05:56, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Paul Stanley. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 05:57, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for personal attacks on other editors. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

Gimmetrow 06:02, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mymuffpuff (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I'd like to note here that a mistke has been made and an innocent user has been banned: Malikarcanum was accused below of creating this account as a sock puppet...I do not know who he is; I have created a number of account to harass a user called Elizabeth Bathory or Erzsébet Báthory for reasons that I will not outline here. If you look at the history of her talk page you will note that I have been doing this for some time, the name I used before this one was KuruPooPoo...while it was my intention to harass the above named user I do feel poorly that an innocent person has apparently lost his privilages here.

Decline reason:

That has nothing to do with your block. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 21:50, 12 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Sockpuppetry case[edit]

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Malikarcanum for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. Mfield (talk) 06:28, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]