Jump to content

User talk:Myrealnamm

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from User talk:Myrealnamm-alt)

Your submission at Articles for creation: IPadOS 18 has been accepted[edit]

IPadOS 18, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

GTrang (talk) 23:00, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Guestbook Barnstars[edit]

Hi, on your Guestbook I noticed that you said you'd give out the Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar for signing your guestbook... while that is very nice of you and everything, WP:GUESTBOOK it says Don't give barnstars out just for signing a guestbook. It devalues the barnstar process. I'm not sure if it's talking about the regular Barnstar or all of them in particular, but I'd remove that and stop (if you haven't already) giving out Barnstars for signing. Again this is all friendly I'm just leaving you a note :D (and yes, I signed your guestbook!). Cheers, GoldRomean (talk) 01:18, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

PS: If you have time, could you possibly teach me a thing or two about custom sigs? Nothing to extreme, just very basic stuff. I'm pretty bad at WikiMarkup and that kind of stuff. GoldRomean (talk) 01:18, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@GoldRomean Ok, thanks for the information. It was just that I saw another user giving barnstars for signing guestbooks, so I thought it was a great idea. I've removed it now, and thanks for signing it!
I started my signatures as the default (which is your user name and the talk button, as you have now). I'm on my alternate account right now. If you look at my other signatures from this page, I used colors. If you look at User talk:Myrealnamm#Your signature, you can see RedRose's feedback on signatures. At first I used {{subst:COLOR|red|hello}} and replaced "red" with HEX codes, such as #0085BD, and hello with my text, to produce something like this:
Myrealnamm
However, if you edit source, you can see it adds a bunch of stuff like "</span> and class="tmp-color" , which might exceed 425 characters in length (which is the limit for number of characters in your signature), so I tried to remove those codes and used the sandbox for testing, until I made my text within 425 characters. Then, you can go to Special:Preferences and go to the Signature section to insert WikiText there. Be sure to select Treat the above as wiki markup. otherwise it will not work.
REMEMBER: Applying color is only one way of customizing your signature, there are also many other ways to customise your signature. I would recommend taking a look at WP:SIGNATURE and Help:Wikitext. They've helped me. Myrealnamm's Alternate Account (talk) 12:45, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Myrealnamm Okay, I totally understand. Thanks for the helpful stuff with the signatures! GoldRomean (talk) 12:54, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Pssss. I'm also not good with Wikitext. @GoldRomean........... Myrealnamm's Alternate Account (talk) 12:56, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes reviewer granted[edit]

Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

Extraordinary Writ (talk) 00:03, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kalinga under the Mauryan[edit]

I just edited and improved the article in good faith in order to expand and reform the article. 59.93.0.169 (talk) 06:53, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@59.93.0.169 Thanks for your contributions, however, I have moved it to the draft space and restored the redirect. It might need to be rewritten. The new draft is at Draft:Kalinga under the Mauryan Myrealnamm (💬pros · ✏️cons) 12:31, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – July 2024[edit]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (June 2024).

Administrator changes

added
removed

Technical news

Miscellaneous

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:59, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You are correct to have failed Draft:Angela Kelly (photographer) as a reviewer[edit]

And please keep eyes on. It's actually an interesting subject, but I have a hunch this author is a student or other supporter because the language is so positive. Reviewers are encouraged to give both negative and positive feedback (although time frequently being an issue, I can understand why this is sometimes lost). BusterD (talk) 20:22, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @BusterD, thanks for your feedback. I've only been working on AfC for a day or two (after being granted the tools, I'm currently in probation). I looked at the article for a while before deciding to decline it because it was too promotional. Sorry for the CSD though, I was asking at Wikipedia IRC about it and someone suggested that if I couldn't find any notable coverage then I should go ahead, but I didn't think smart enough about it. To be honest, I think the draft could be improved (when not thinking about CSD'ing ) but it will take a while.
I should try to accept more drafts to be created (currently did none so far) but I'm still trying to get a good understanding of how this all works before I do something big. I'll try my best to give more feedback, as you mentioned, to declined drafts so they can be improved. Myrealnamm (💬pros · ✏️cons) 20:41, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Making mistakes along the way is expected, especially for a new reviewer. I get sentimental and occasionally "fall in love" with a subject, making it hard for me to be objective. Don't get in a hurry, but don't take too much time on a single review either. You just have to do a bunch until you find your own sweet spot. Enjoy the newness; it wears off. Thanks for your many contributions, Myrealnamm. Don't be shy about flagging down another admin or senior editor if you need tips or encouragment. We all goof up (hopefully not on the front page). BusterD (talk) 20:48, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar[edit]

The Original Barnstar
Didn't find a barnstar for teamwork, but for your work with CSD and UAA! I feel like work in these areas deserves some recognition. 😊 see you around! SPF121188 (talk this way) (my edits) 17:07, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for that, much appreciated 😁. My first Original Barnstar, previous ones for Anti-Vandalism. Also appreciate your work at UAA!
Oh, thanks for adding the title here. "You beat me on this one"!
Cheers, Myrealnamm (💬pros · ✏️cons) 17:10, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Now and then I forget to click "preview" with these... 🤦‍♂️ LOL cheers back at you, see you around! SPF121188 (talk this way) (my edits) 17:12, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Spf121188 Thanks! Btw, there is a teamwork barnstar (Template:The Teamwork Barnstar) but I personally prefer using the Heart icon at the top of the page, next to View History to send WikiLoves. Laters! Myrealnamm (💬pros · ✏️cons) 17:14, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You just taught me something new LOL thanks! Had no idea that heart at the top had a function! SPF121188 (talk this way) (my edits) 17:16, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Trouted[edit]

Whack!

You've been whacked with a wet trout.

Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly.

You have been trouted for: literally no reason at all M7md1612 (talk) 14:44, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ok😁 Myrealnamm (💬pros · ✏️cons) 14:47, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
That can smart! BusterD (talk) 23:33, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Request for a Review[edit]

Hi,

@Myrealnamm, thank you for reviewing my biography article earlier and leaving a helpful feedback for me. I want to ask that you revisit it and review it again, since I have rewritten it to meet the required standard.

Thank you. Stephenranks (talk) 17:32, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Myrealnamm&oldid=1234307329"