User talk:MysticMoment

MysticMoment, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi MysticMoment! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Masumrezarock100 (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:02, 7 July 2020 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Views/Day	Title	Tagged with…
8	Declan McAleer (talk)	Add sources
8	John Sweetman (talk)	Add sources
7	Tony Magan (talk)	Add sources
52	Seán Lynch (politician) (talk)	Add sources
24	Edward Martyn (talk)	Add sources
16	Gregory Reyes (talk)	Add sources
103	Marc Dreier (talk)	Cleanup
161	Non-coding RNA (talk)	Cleanup
68	Circular RNA (talk)	Cleanup
108	Disappeared (Northern Ireland) (talk)	Expand
644	Democratic Unionist Party (talk)	Expand
36	Cross-community vote (talk)	Expand
14	Battle of Kilmallock (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
2,477	Sinn Féin (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
6	Brook's Club bombing (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
178	Provisional Irish Republican Army campaign (talk)	Merge
16	Provisional IRA's Glasgow cell (talk)	Merge
644	Government of the 33rd Dáil (talk)	Merge
64	Irish Republican Army–Abwehr collaboration (talk)	Wikify
2	MicroRNA 7-2 (talk)	Wikify
39	Health in the United Kingdom (talk)	Wikify
2	MicroRNA 548v (talk)	Orphan
2	MicroRNA 5680 (talk)	Orphan
2	MicroRNA 486-1 (talk)	Orphan
20	Dawn Doyle (talk)	Stub
2	MicroRNA 6850 (talk)	Stub
11	Karen Mullan (talk)	Stub
2	MicroRNA 4521 (talk)	Stub
11	Catherine Kelly (talk)	Stub
16	Colm Gildernew (talk)	Stub

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 07:28, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Teddywidder (July 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DGG was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Teddywidder and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Teddywidder, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DGG ( talk ) 11:48, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nicole Zitzmann (July 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TheImaCow was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Nicole Zitzmann and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Nicole Zitzmann, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

--TheImaCow (talk • contribs) 14:35, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Edwin W. Taylor has been accepted

Edwin W. Taylor, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

DGG ( talk ) 09:39, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Daniel Gottschling

I've moved a page you created, Daniel Gottschling, to the draft space. ~~The article doesn't yet show why the subject passes Wikipedia:Notability_(academics)#Criteria, although I can see some promise in it, given Gottschling's work on yeast.~~ Too many of the references are published by organizations affiliated with the subject. Inserting more references to organizations that Gottschling doesn't work for is or part of will help show notability. Hog Farm _Bacon 18:33, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Hog Farm:, I looked at Wikipedia:Notability_(academics)#Criteria and found this:"Academics meeting any one of the following conditions, as substantiated through reliable sources, are notable." Gottschling meets two of the 8 criteria: 1. "The person has received a highly prestigious academic award or honor at a national or international level. 2. The person has been an elected member of a highly selective and prestigious scholarly society or association (e.g., a National Academy of Sciences or the Royal Society) or a fellow of a major scholarly society which reserves fellow status as a highly selective honor (e.g., Fellow of the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers).

Both of those criteria are backed up with the following independent sources: NAS and NAS Award. I always thought members of the NAS were automatically considered notable, so I would like to thank you for showing me exactly where in Wikipedia it says that. Now I wonder if you can please "un-draft" the article, or explain to me how I can do it myself. Thanks again. MysticMoment (talk) 06:28, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I've struck the part about the notability, as after reading it, I was clearly wrong. However, the NAS sources are not independent of the subject, as he's a member of the NAS, so he's closely affiliated with the organization. I'll undraft the article, but it really needs sources that aren't affiliated with the subject in any way. Colleges he teaches at and organization he is members of are not independent sources. Hog Farm _Bacon 14:38, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Hog Farm:, I agree that the sources from his colleges and other organizations that he is affiliated with are not independent, but I disagree about the NAS sources. At least not when it comes to his award and his membership. The problem with using his colleges as a source is that, obviously, he can write whatever biography he wants there, aside from the fact that he is a teacher there in a certain field. The NAS website is the BEST source to know if he is a member of the NAS. That fact, on that website, is completely out of his control. If it said on his bio on his college's web site that he was a member of the NAS, but was not corroborated on the NAS site, then yes, you cannot use that information from the college. I think this is just a matter of common sense. MysticMoment (talk) 07:40, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Memorial to Enslaved Laborers

I would appreciate an explanation about why you put Start Class on this well-documented article. What's missing? deisenbe (talk) 17:47, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Deisenbe: The assessment process, especially of "class" is highly subjective. Please look here https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Content_assessment for more information. One thing that would help the article rise in class would be a photograph of the memorial. I am sure there are other things you can find to add by carefully reading the article and looking for sources for more information. MysticMoment (talk) 07:27, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Viatris logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Viatris logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:10, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Nicole Zitzmann

Hello, MysticMoment. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Nicole Zitzmann, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 08:01, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Changingguardsatbuckinghampalace per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Changingguardsatbuckinghampalace. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. GeneralNotability (talk) 00:53, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]