You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Predicting the timing of peak oil. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Jauerback (talk) 19:39, 18 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Just a friendly note. I think you accidentally changed my talk page comment here: diff. Please do not edit other peoples' talk page comments. Thank you. ~a (user • talk • contribs) 00:11, 20 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, my mistake. I ment to change my comment because I put the wrong revision. I was in a hurry and at a public computer, so I didn't even notice I changed yours. I guess from now on I'd better wait until I have more time to edit. NJGW (talk) 00:16, 20 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Predicting the timing of peak oil. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Jauerback (talk) 19:39, 18 December 2007 (UTC)