User talk:NNEmergency

Welcome![edit]

Hello NNEmergency! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! XLinkBot (talk) 16:50, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
Wikipedia Tutorial • The five pillars of Wikipedia How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Frequently Asked Questions Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Fair use • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Build consensus • Resolving disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community Portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Things to do
Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Pages needing attention • Peer review Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Useful templates • Categories • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Tools • User scripts

January 2021[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page South Wales Fire and Rescue Service has been reverted.
Your edit here to South Wales Fire and Rescue Service was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://www.youtube.com/user/SouthWalesFire) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. music or video) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy, as well as other parts of our external links guideline. If the information you linked to is indeed in violation of copyright, then such information should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file, or consider linking to the original.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 16:50, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

April 2021[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Mid and West Wales Fire and Rescue Service, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Saying you have been to all the stations yourself is not a reliable source it is original research. You should only add material that can be verified by other people looking at the references. If you need any help with this feel free to ask as there can be some good places to look to get some of the information (if not all of it) 10mmsocket (talk) 19:04, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at Mid and West Wales Fire and Rescue Service, you may be blocked from editing. Your edits to this article and South Wales Fire and Rescue Service. Please stop or you will be reported to the administrators. 10mmsocket (talk) 07:01, 19 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Instead of being disruptive, why don't you do some research and look for verifiable sources that confirm the appliances used by each fire service. Remember they must be verifiable (see WP:V), they can't be based on personal knowledge. If you need help then ask, as well as me there's lots of others who are happy to help another editor learn how to use Wikipedia. --10mmsocket (talk) 07:03, 19 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation[edit]

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/NNEmergency, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Greyjoy^talk 07:55, 19 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not even me, its a colleagues account not mine NNEmergency (talk) 08:01, 19 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for confirming that you have been coordianting edits off Wiki to violate policies and guidleines. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, with little if any interest in information "from headquarters". "All content must be cited from reliable sources that are unconnected with the subject and have a reputation for fact checking." --Deepfriedokra (talk) 08:08, 19 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please share this information with your colleagues. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 17:07, 19 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

April 2021[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing certain pages (South Wales Fire and Rescue Service) for WP:COI and WP:SOCKPUPPETRY on South Wales Fire and Rescue Service ‎.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 08:10, 19 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 17:08, 19 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

NNEmergency (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

all information is correct NNEmergency (talk) 17:43, 19 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You are blocked for abusing multiple accounts, not for posting incorrect information. In your next unblock request, you should address this reason. PhilKnight (talk) 20:02, 19 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

NNEmergency (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

all accounts where made to protect the swfrs wiki page from people removing information that peolpe need NNEmergency (talk) 15:33, 21 April 2021 (UTC)

Decline reason:

A mere admission of sockpuppetry is insufficient to get your account unblocked. —C.Fred (talk) 15:36, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/10mmsocket for removing information without confirming correct or false and using many accounts to undo work of others