User talk:NXTguru

Notability of Webkinz cheat codes

A tag has been placed on Webkinz cheat codes requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. De728631 (talk) 21:28, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Fourth generation ipod nano

A tag has been placed on Fourth generation ipod nano, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as the Wikipedia:Business' FAQ for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Ironho lds 21:38, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

September 2008

Please do not add copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder, as you did to Napoleon (Animal Farm). For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. --DAJF (talk) 23:19, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Ipod (refurbished)

A tag has been placed on Ipod (refurbished), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the article or have a copy emailed to you. Steamroller Assault (talk) 19:47, 8 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ipod (refurbished)

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Ipod (refurbished), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

The article is mainly covering refurbished products in general, has no references, is ever-so-slightly spammy, etc.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. {{Nihiltres|talk|log}} 01:56, 12 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Lego Mindstorms NXT sensors

A tag has been placed on Lego Mindstorms NXT sensors, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add {{hangon}} on the top of Lego Mindstorms NXT sensors and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Gilo1969 (talk) 01:32, 13 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

January 2009

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Lego Mindstorms NXT sensors. Please use the {{hangon}} template on the page instead if you disagree with the deletion. Thank you. Steamroller Assault (talk) 21:24, 15 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Sensors (Lego Mindstorms NXT)

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Sensors (Lego Mindstorms NXT), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Unlikely redirect. Consider redirect to Lego_Mindstorms_NXT#Sensors if prod is declined.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Steamroller Assault (talk) 08:51, 16 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

March 2009

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Hillary Rodham Clinton. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.--The Magnificent Clean-keeper (talk) 20:38, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

October 2009

Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Barack Obama. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. guyzero | talk 20:50, 19 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for repeated abuse of editing privileges. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Jayron32 21:15, 19 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

NXTguru (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have greatly matured and have learned from my Wikipedia mistakes, and will not repeat them. I would like to be allowed to make worthwhile contributions to the community.

Accept reason:

Both the blocking admin and myself feel it is worth giving you another chance. Welcome back. Beeblebrox (talk) 17:53, 29 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]