User talk:Nagarajubhu

Why not create a user page?[edit]

Hi wikifriend,

First I must say welcome. Wikipedia really needs you and there is

As a new users, you have a user page. Your user page has a name like this: User:Example. Its normal use is to give basic information, if you wish, about yourself or your Wikimedia-related activities. Although it helps other users know more about you, you don't have to say anything about yourself. You may wish to create a user page on Meta so that it will display on all Wikimedia projects where you have not created a local user page. You may click my name to see what is obtainable.

I'm a 21 year old human. You could drop me a message on my talk page or Wiki mail me for any questions or issues around Wikipedia. You may get help from the rich resources here and here as well.

Danidamiobi (talk) 17:25, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Needi Naadi Oke Katha has been accepted[edit]

Needi Naadi Oke Katha, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Atlantic306 (talk) 15:22, 6 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ee Nagaraniki Emaindi.jpg[edit]

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:23, 9 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pantham.jpg[edit]

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:23, 9 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

August 2018[edit]

This is your only warning; if you insert a spam link to Wikipedia again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted, preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines. Diffs: [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9] Based on these edits, it appears that you are here to drive traffic to your blog telugumovieanalysis.xyz. This is not only a conflict of interest, which is a serious ethical concern, but it also constitutes spam, which nobody likes. Short story: We don't care what blogs think, we're only interested in what mainstream sources with established reputations think about anything. Since you have made other constructive edits, I'm not going to block you indefinitely, but if you add any more spammy links, I will not hesitate to do so. You should familiarise yourself with WP:ICTF#Guidelines on sources for an example of sites that are considered sufficient for use. Lastly, do not summarise films' commercial or critical response without providing a reference that arrives at a conclusion about the overall response. Editors are not critical response aggregators. And, "mixed to positive" / "mixed to negative" / "negative to mixed" / etc. language is considered meaningless by multiple WikiProjects. Avoid it, please. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 17:01, 4 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Happy Wedding(2018 film).jpg[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:Happy Wedding(2018 film).jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.

ATTENTION: This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 22 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Cast names in film plots[edit]

Please do NOT add actors' names in the plot, as you did at Pushpa: The Rise as this is contrary to WP:FILMPLOT "Do not include actors' names in the plot summary" - Thank you - Arjayay (talk) 13:02, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]