User talk:Nandadnk

Hogenakkal Falls

I have reverted your edits on the Hogenakkal Falls article. Please explain your rationale in reverting the article to a old version. Regards, Ganeshk (talk) 23:29, 7 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Three-revert rule warning

Warning

Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. Rather than reverting, discuss disputed changes on the talk page. The revision you want is not going to be implemented by edit warring. Thank you. Ganeshk (talk) 02:11, 8 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problems with File:Vinessa Elizabeth Shaw.jpg

Hello. Concerning your contribution, File:Vinessa Elizabeth Shaw.jpg, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). As a copyright violation, File:Vinessa Elizabeth Shaw.jpg appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. File:Vinessa Elizabeth Shaw.jpg has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at [[Talk:File:Vinessa Elizabeth Shaw.jpg]] and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at [[Talk:File:Vinessa Elizabeth Shaw.jpg]] with a link to where we can find that note.
If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on [[Talk:File:Vinessa Elizabeth Shaw.jpg]].

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you. (ESkog)^(Talk) 02:59, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Upload of copyrighted image

Hi, in reference to File:Karunanidhi.jpg which appears to have been copied off any number of websites and is clearly not yours: please do not upload images like this - your have been warned above about this and should not that repeated copyright violation may result in you being blocked from the site - Peripitus (Talk) 05:25, 22 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Asha Gowda

The article Asha Gowda has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

BLP Fails GNG and BIO. BEFORE showed nothing that meets SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth. WP:BLP states "Be very firm about the use of high-quality sources"'; BLPs need IS RS with SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth for both content and notability to avoid abuse per well known core policy (WP:V and WP:BLP) and guidelines (WP:BIO and WP:IS, WP:RS, WP:SIGCOV).

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. // Timothy :: talk 02:05, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Asha Gowda moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Asha Gowda, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, to be safe. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 10:44, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Asha Gowda

Hello, Nandadnk. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Asha Gowda, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:05, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]