Jump to content

User talk:NathanHollister

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, NathanHollister! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! I dream of horses If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. @ 06:43, 3 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines

The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous

NathanHollister, you are invited to the Teahouse!

[edit]
Teahouse logo

Hi NathanHollister! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Come join other new editors at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a space where new editors can get help from other new editors. These editors have also just begun editing Wikipedia; they may have had similar experiences as you. Come share your experiences, ask questions, and get advice from your peers. I hope to see you there! Doctree (I'm a Teahouse host)

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:18, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Apology

[edit]

Apologies, I undid a small edit you made here because I misread the diff—I've now corrected it back to your version. —Nizolan (talk) 01:04, 19 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

[edit]
Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

I have blocked this account for 1 month. While you were engaged in an edit war, you logged into an old, disused account to continue the same edit war. You then admitted to doing so here. Please don't do this again. --Jayron32 16:49, 7 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

NathanHollister (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

That other account is not me, there seems to be a misunderstanding. It's someone else with the same opinion. It's quite clear by my post history that I do not engage in personal attacks, nor post on other people's pages. NathanHollister (talk) 16:55, 7 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Your claim doesn't match the evidence. I was tempted to extend your block because of your attempt to mislead us but decided against it. Please take this into consideration before deciding what to write in any further unblock requests. Yamla (talk) 17:14, 7 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Just to clarify for any admins that review the above request. Here with the last edit this account made at Men Going Their Own Way, this account stated in the edit summary " the SPLC does not have MGTOW on their list of hate groups". A very short time later, This account shows up for their first edit in 5 years. Later, that same account (the sleeper account that showed up out of nowhere) stated Here "I correctly stated MGTOW is not on SPLC list" even though that statement was made by the NathanHollister account. I will let another admin review this evidence when they respond to the unblock request above. --Jayron32 17:13, 7 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The other account is not me. While they claim to be me, they are not. Either one of the users with whom I disagreed was using this other account to impersonate me, or another person entirely is just stirring the pot. — Preceding unsigned comment added by NathanHollister (talkcontribs)

I invite you to strike and withdraw this accusation because it's not true and it is pissing me off that someone with as much demonstrated deception as you have would call into question my integrity.--Jorm (talk) 17:28, 7 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]