User talk:Nathanaeljones
Quick Key[edit]
If you read the article, it reads like a press release or a glowing report on the software. It does not read like an encyclopedic article. That leads me to conclude it is spam since it likely came from a source within the company. My decision is based on that article alone as it should be. We do not use the the fact that other articles of the same type exist to decide on keeping a specific article. Of the other articles you listed, I only looked at BabelMap. While it reads better, I'm not sure that it merits an article either. I think the solution here is to merge these related software products into one article for this class of software. Then have a heading for each With a redirect from the old article to be section in the new one. If you want to look at a redirect try Las Vegas.
Welcome and enjoy. Vegaswikian 21:48, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
The article Comparison of JavaScript-based source code editors has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Semi-referenced comparison of editors, only one of which is notable enough for its own article.
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Top Jim (talk) 10:24, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
The article Comparison of JavaScript-based source code editors has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
The entire article is original research -- the feature tests are a user's original research. I don't think this topic is notable, but even if it is, cleaning up the original research would amount to blanking the page.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. HyperAccelerated (talk) 16:24, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
Nomination of Comparison of JavaScript-based source code editors for deletion[edit]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Comparison of JavaScript-based source code editors until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.HyperAccelerated (talk) 16:27, 21 June 2024 (UTC)