User talk:Neckername

Wikipedia vandalism information
(abuse log)

Low to moderate level of vandalism

[view • purge • update]

The more persistent vandals are sleeping in. --I dream of horses (T) @ 15:00, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome[edit]

Hello, Neckername, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on this page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! --Srleffler (talk) 13:48, 20 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Talk[edit]

Just talk about anything here. Most preferably what I can do to improve my article creation and editing. Just post it right here. Make sure to post only appropriate things and useful things. Also please remember to sign whatever you post as it will be deleted if you fail to do so, also please include the post date and time (preferably Eastern Standard Time). Also please do not edit any posts that are not yours, use polite Wikipedia etiquette (failure to do so after one warning will result in a report to wikipedia officials, and all posts posted from the same IP and/or user from that point on will be deleted ASAP. Thanks :-) (Proud Gamer (talk) 03:12, 1 August 2008 (UTC))[reply]

Please post only below this line, posts that are not under this line will be moved to the correct spot on my talk page.

You might want to remove your email address from your user page. Spammers use bots that scan the web for email addresses. Posting an address in the clear pretty much ensures you will get lots of spam. If you want people to be able to email you, set your email address in your user preferences. A link that says "E-mail this user" then appears in the toolbox at the left side of the page, allowing any user to send you mail, but without revealing the address to everyone. --Srleffler (talk) 04:53, 1 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you remove the model numbers from the Future Phenom II page? --Mouzreaper (talk) —Preceding undated comment was added at 09:34, 1 February 2009 (UTC).[reply]

Hey just a question? Are you any good with coding? like for games as such and other things? if so can you get back to me on. ilike_purple.at.hotmail.com Thanks Alot!

Citing sources[edit]

Hello, Neckername. I appreciate your contributions to articles, however it is necessary that any non-obvious facts you insert must be justified by a reliable source. This is so others can verify your work. Citing sources is as simple as: after you write a block of information from one source, type <ref>, then the website or book or whatever, and then </ref>. You can read up on Wikipedia:Reliable sources and Wikipedia:Citing sources for more information. If you have any questions, you can ask me. --harej 21:52, 2 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your RfA[edit]

Hi there. While we appreciate everyone who wants to help, I'd recommend you withdraw your current RfA. It has no chance of succeeding against the standards that have evolved at RfA these days. This is nothing personal, so please do not regard it as such. Rather, it is to spare you and us going through a request that does have a snowball's chance in hell to succeed. I am sure you intend only to help us and as such we'll surely be happy if you retry the request after you have contributed enough to the project so that we can evaluate you correctly. Regards So Why 21:43, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

SoWhy's got it about right... You are very new here, and, you've made about 54 edits to the site so far... That's really not enough to get a good feel for how things work here, nor the various (many I'd say...) rules and guidelines around here. If it's alright with you, I'd like to close your RFA for the time being (I can delete it, if you'd like), and at some point in the future, you can try again. I'd wait at least until you've been active here for 3 - 6 months. Thanks, SQL ^{Query me!} 21:49, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I am sorry, but I have closed your Request for adminship prematurely. Simply put, you only have 54 edits on Wikipedia; while your edit count isn't the only determining factor, and numerous people have their own personal standards by which they judge RfA candidates, this particular RfA was all but assured of not passing.

I am sorry about this, and I hope you don't take it personally. If you continue to contribute to the project in a positive fashion, I am confident that you would be able to submit a successful RfA in the future. You may wish to consider applying for an evaluation by other Wikipedia editors for feedback on how to obtain the necessary experience. Once you are ready to request adminship again, there is a great admin coaching program available, as well as a guide to requests for adminship.

If you have any other questions about becoming an administrator, please don't hesitate to ask me. Good luck! — Aitias // discussion 22:15, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Editor review[edit]

Thank you for submitting your RFA. We need more admins. But first you need to gain experience in editing our encyclopedia and in admin related tasks. Admins are trusted to block and unblock other editors, delete and undelete pages and protect and unprotect pages. One should gain experience and familiarity with such areas as WP:AIV, WP:AFD, WP:CSD, Wikipedia:Protection policy, and WP:BLOCK to learn when to do these things. Most recent;y, many RFA participants have required significant article building as well as experience in admin related areas. I have used this as an opportunity to review your edits till now. I will offer commentary linked to the edits in question and with links to policy and guidelines you may want to review.

Links to external images will not work. Also, all content must be public domain or GFDL. External image links would wind up violating that. We use images that are uploaded per policy here or on wikimedia. Our image guidelines can be found at Wikipedia:Images.

Adding content is good. We need article building. When adding content, one should cite a reliable source that has verifiable information.

Be careful to not use Twinkle when not reverting vandalism.

Otherwise, heed the advice I left on your RFA. Hope this helps. Cheers, and good luck for the future. Dloh cierekim 22:18, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

—Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.180.11.1 (talk) 16:39, 27 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

EditorReviewArchiver: Automatic processing of your editor review[edit]

This is an automated message. Your editor review is scheduled to be closed on 28 October 2011 because it will have been open for more than 30 days and inactive for more than 7 days. You can keep it open longer by posting a comment to the review page requesting more input. Adding  to the review page will prevent further automated actions. AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:22, 25 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]