User talk:Necronizer

Vanessa-Mae[edit]

Please read the Talk:Vanessa-Mae page. As I said over there, the discography list should be restored, and all the detailed info on each album should go into their own articles. Since we're not allowed to revert more than 3 times or so in a short period of time, even when it's actually necessary, I guess I will have to either wait for someone else to do it, or wait for you to restore the Vanessa-Mae article yourself. It doesn't look very good as it is now. Maver1ck 20:46, 4 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You can revert vandalism as often as necessary. -- RHaworth 09:24, 6 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello Necronizer, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! tregoweth 05:39, 5 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi -- while your enthusiasm is welcomed, I would like to suggest that you familiarize yourself with Wikipedia customs and article style. For example, the articles you created for Vanessa-Mae albums really had little to no content and were improperly named, so I have deleted a lot of them. tregoweth 06:00, 5 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as The Alternative Record from Vanessa-Mae, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material.

This article appears to be a direct copy from http://www.vanessamae.com/alternative.shtml. As a copyright violation, The Alternative Record from Vanessa-Mae appears to qualify for speedy deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. The Alternative Record from Vanessa-Mae has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. If the source is a credible one, please consider rewriting the content and citing the source.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GFDL, you can comment to that effect on Talk:The Alternative Record from Vanessa-Mae. If the article has already been deleted, but you have a proper release, you can reenter the content at The Alternative Record from Vanessa-Mae, after describing the release on the talk page. However, you may want to consider rewriting the content in your own words.

Thank you, and please feel free to continue contributing to Wikipedia. r3m0t ^talk 22:51, 5 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright issues[edit]

Hi there! It seems you have been having some issues with copyrights. A few of the articles that you have created have been flagged as copyright violations. I noticed that you removed the tags on several occasions and stated the source for the text. Unfortunately, we still cannot keep copyrighted text on articles even if the source is given. The Wikipedia:Copyrights page gives some good info about all of this.

You'll notice on the tagged pages, there is a link that says "follow this link to a temporary subpage". You certainly seem to be a fan of Vanessa Mae, so feel free to write about the album on that subpage in your own words. In about a weeks time, an administrator will remove the copyright tag and delete the copyrighted edits and replace it all with the version that is in the subpage. If you want to know how to write a great article on an album have a look at some of the albums listed here (but these articles are the best of the best when it comes to album articles).

All the best...if you have any questions or comments, don't hesitate to write to me on my talk page. Thank you :-) Akamad 10:57, 6 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Vaanetae4.jpg)[edit]

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Vaanetae4.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that the image can be used under a fair use license. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Thuresson 15:57, 29 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Fontanini.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Fontanini.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 09:03, 24 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Fontanini_angel.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Fontanini_angel.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 08:32, 27 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Esce1.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Esce1.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 19:08, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Vanexa.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Vanexa.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 02:28, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]