User talk:Neil Gamon

October 2017[edit]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Proportional representation, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Sjö (talk) 12:14, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I think I mass-reverting some good-faith edits mixed in with some very bad ones. I'll be more careful in the future.Neil Gamon (talk) 14:17, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for restoring one of my edits. (The one about no sources for a sentence in the intro.) I think people are mad at you for the same reason I was slightly upset. It's better to edit out only the parts you don't like then click the undo button, and undo a whole bunch of people's stuff. Anyway, happy editing :). — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fireflyfan99 (talk • contribs) 14:32, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Doug Weller talk 16:09, 9 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]