User talk:Nenolod/Archive-July2007

Sockpuppetry case[edit]

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Nenolod for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page.

cacophony ◄► 00:13, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, my browser does not cache authentication credentials between sessions. Sometimes I have accidentally edited the encyclopedia anonymously because of this. I will attempt to ensure that all of my edits are under user:nenolod in the future. --nenolod (talk) 00:23, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This has been withdrawn, thanks cacophony! --nenolod File:Sigpaw.gif (talk) 02:43, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Smile![edit]

WHeimbigner has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Um, thank you. I think. --nenolod File:Sigpaw.gif (talk) 01:04, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Signature[edit]

Per WP:SIG you are not allowed images in your signature, I would get it off quick before a sysop does something !
> Rugby471 ^talk 16:41, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disappointing, however I can point at other Wikipedians who have more images than I did in mine. --nenolod (talk) (edits) 22:22, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia Policy Violations[edit]

Hello, I noticed that during the InspIRCd AfD, you simultaneously listed several other IRC-related articles for proposed deletion. The articles in question are as follows:

What I also noticed is that the IRC-related article Atheme remained devoid of any such prod template. This is suspicious because you are a developer on this very project. What makes this more suspicious is that when somebody else added the template to the page, you subsequently removed it without actually improving the article, or indeed making any other changes at all. When the template was re-added, you re-removed it, again without making any other changes. Now, here's where the story changes;
The template was added again, and only hours later, you removed it again, only this time you did it from your IP address rather than from your user account. Please note that this was only a few hours later. Finally, the template was re-added once again, and removed again by your IP address, rather than from your account.
These last two edits, which originated from your IP address only hours after the previous edits originated from your username, constitute abuse of the anonymous editing system to avoid enforcement of the three revert rule.

I am thus forced to conclude two things:

1. Your edits to the first five articles were in retaliation to the InspIRCd AfD, which I notice you have developed for, and thus a violation of WP:POINT.
2. Your edits in removing the proposed deletion templates from Atheme were in bad faith, in violation of WP:COI, contradictory to the other five edits in question, and, due to intentional editing from your IP rather than your username, a violation of WP:3RR.

Of course, none of these accusations mean anything simply as accusations. Thus, I propose that you personally remove the offending proposed deletion templates from the five said articles you added them to and re-add them to Atheme. Please respond when you get a chance. Regards, cacophony ◄► 08:13, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You've got it. --nenolod (talk) (edits) 08:15, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Also note that because Atheme is now proposed, I have gone ahead and proposed other IRC services packages as non-notable because none meet WP:Notability guidelines. --nenolod (talk) (edits) 08:21, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Why would you go and do something like that? I don't see the correlation between the two. cacophony ◄► 08:24, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Simple. They are equally non-notable. Go ahead, ban me. You know you want to. --nenolod (talk) (edits) 08:27, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm, IRC doesn't seem that notable. Only a few thousand people will ever use it if they find out about it, and that's like....less than 1% of the 8-9 billion people on planet Earth.... Not notable. If it were something like Microsoft, then I would see notability. Sleepy Coder 09:36, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Moreover, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Proposed_deletion#Conflicts says my behaviour was correct wrt WP:3RR assertion. --nenolod (talk) (edits) 09:40, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]